Re: Where should guile modules store meta data?

[Clark McGrew <mcgrew@ale.physics.sunysb.edu>]

>>>>> "Jost" == Jost Boekemeier <jostobfe@linux.zrz.TU-Berlin.DE> writes:

    Jost> At the moment I think the new module system should only
    Jost> support (module-define ..) for backward compatibility and
    Jost> maybe (define-public ..).

You mean "define-module" right.

    Jost> What else do you need? :)

How about a compatible form of export.  I'm not going to grieve if
define-public disappears.

I'm not a module guru, so I'm only talking about simple syntax for a
simple users (me).  Perhaps I'm missing the point.  Are you proposing second
incompadible way to define modules, or are you talking about extending
define-module to be better?

Cheers,

Clark