This is the mail archive of the guile@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the Guile project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: xlib binding

To: guile at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
Subject: Re: xlib binding
From: Rob Browning <rlb at cs dot utexas dot edu>
Date: 26 Sep 1999 11:39:05 -0500
References: <87so444v7w.fsf@cr610941-a.rct1.bc.wave.home.com> <qrrpuz82sj1.fsf@elwha.cs.washington.edu> <87905wudqw.fsf@cr610941-a.rct1.bc.wave.home.com> <87g1031370.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <m3n1uakfvb.fsf@savonarola.red-bean.com> <871zbmldcu.fsf@cr610941-a.rct1.bc.wave.home.com>

Stephen Tse <stephent@sfu.ca> writes:

> I agree! Also, for the sake of hacking, I am playing with direct
> implementation of x11 protocol in guile network code (`socket',
> `connect'...) instead of just linking c xlib to guile interface. Do
> you think guile is versatile enough that a complete efficient x11
> protocol implementation would be possible?

I don't know if it would be helpful, but RScheme has a set of
preliminary bindings and (I belive) some docs on low-level protocol
issues in its add-on modules (available via cvs).  I haven't looked at
them closely, but they sound like they might be relevant.

-- 
Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu> PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F5D64E3930

Follow-Ups:
- Re: xlib binding
  - From: Alan McLean

References:
- xlib binding
  - From: Stephen Tse
- Re: xlib binding
  - From: Stephen Tse
- Re: xlib binding
  - From: Marius Vollmer
- Re: xlib binding
  - From: Jim Blandy
- Re: xlib binding
  - From: Stephen Tse

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]