Re: Scwm docstrings change

[Sam Falkner <samf at central dot sun dot com>]

I'll vote on Greg's side, where SCM_PROC expands to a function header.

I do a lot more C programming that scheme/lisp, and I usually avoid
macros in C.  That said, though, I think that the SCM_PROC is cleaner,
the main reason being that you don't have to duplicate the arg list
for reflection (as was mentioned later in the thread I think).

Also, I'm not really comfortable with the idea of providing both
options (as has been suggested later), but I suppose it would be okay
as long as the core of Guile stuck to one way or the other.

- Sam