This is the mail archive of the guile@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the Guile project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Doc Tasks (was RE: docstrings in Guile!)

To: "Greg J. Badros" <gjb at cs dot washington dot edu>
Subject: Re: Doc Tasks (was RE: docstrings in Guile!)
From: thi <ttn at mingle dot glug dot org>
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 1999 10:42:17 -0800 (PST)
Cc: forcer <forcer at mindless dot com>, guile at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
References: <199912171615.LAA06607@bigbird.en.com><qrr3dt1v6wo.fsf@clavicle.cs.washington.edu><m3zov9mmcc.fsf@behemoth.dethfart.org><qrrn1r9tmin.fsf@clavicle.cs.washington.edu><m11z43p-000UueC@boxer.physics.sunysb.edu><qrraen9rxak.fsf@clavicle.cs.washington.edu><hhyaasqrk4.fsf@forcix.burse.uni-hamburg.de><qrr7licqagp.fsf@clavicle.cs.washington.edu>
Reply-To: ttn at netcom dot com

Greg J. Badros writes:

 > I'm glad TeXInfo might not be as awful as I thought, but I still
 > remain steadfast in believing SGML/XML based markup is the way to
 > go. Visit any bookstore and compare the amount of interest in and
 > work on XML/SGML vs. TeXInfo.

by the same argument, we should drop guile scheme and do guile java,
don't you think?

thi

References:
- Re: Doc Tasks (was RE: docstrings in Guile!)
  - From: Dale P. Smith
- Re: Doc Tasks (was RE: docstrings in Guile!)
  - From: Greg J. Badros
- Re: Doc Tasks (was RE: docstrings in Guile!)
  - From: Greg Harvey
- Re: Doc Tasks (was RE: docstrings in Guile!)
  - From: Greg J. Badros
- Re: Doc Tasks (was RE: docstrings in Guile!)
  - From: Clark McGrew
- Re: Doc Tasks (was RE: docstrings in Guile!)
  - From: Greg J. Badros
- Re: Doc Tasks (was RE: docstrings in Guile!)
  - From: forcer
- Re: Doc Tasks (was RE: docstrings in Guile!)
  - From: Greg J. Badros

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]