This is the mail archive of the
guile@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the Guile project.
Re: why undefined return values?
> I agree with this in principle, but not regarding return value in
> `set!'. Note how we have already used this princple regarding set!:
> eval.c contains an R5RS set, which is supposed to be published in the
> R5RS module, while evalext.c contains the extended set! which can
> expand to setter expressions. In this case, there were strong
> usability arguments which made us willing to provide an alternative
> non-R5RS set!.
Oh yes --- I had forgotten about that, puke-for-brains.
> > (Someone should be rude. Otherwise, this won't be a flame war, and we
> > will disappoint Mr. Hartmut.)
>
> Well, I'm not surprised to hear such crap from you, son of a drooling
> hedgehog!
Thou goatish spur-galled bladder!
(I'm too lazy to make up my own insults, so I'll just let Emacs do it
for me. fie.el is my friend.)