This is the mail archive of the guile@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the Guile project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: how to define a transformer?

To: Keisuke Nishida <kxn30 at po dot cwru dot edu>
Subject: Re: how to define a transformer?
From: Jost Boekemeier <jostobfe at linux dot zrz dot TU-Berlin dot DE>
Date: 10 May 2000 19:16:05 +0200
Cc: guile at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
References: <m3itwpghnu.fsf@kei.cwru.edu> <p2titwoq0o9.fsf@ruebe.zrz.tu-berlin.de> <m3d7mw1xwz.fsf@kei.cwru.edu> <p2td7mvy1c8.fsf@apfel.zrz.tu-berlin.de> <m3n1lz8nni.fsf@kei.cwru.edu>

Keisuke Nishida <kxn30@po.cwru.edu> writes:

> | I think it could be ok to require `import-lisp-variable' to make Lisp
> | bindings accessible.  Once that is done, though, I think it would be
> | cleaner to use an ordinary variable reference in Scheme rather that
> | a function call.

That's news to me.  I thought that we want to translate lisp to scheme
in which case Mikael's solution would be appropriate.

Jost

Follow-Ups:
- Re: how to define a transformer?
  - From: Keisuke Nishida
- Re: how to define a transformer?
  - From: Ken Raeburn

References:
- how to define a transformer?
  - From: Keisuke Nishida
- Re: how to define a transformer?
  - From: Jost Boekemeier
- Re: how to define a transformer?
  - From: Keisuke Nishida

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]