This is the mail archive of the
guile@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the Guile project.
Re: [Q] (newbie here) Guile as an extention language.
From: sen_ml@eccosys.com
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 10:21:09 +0900
however, it seems to me that editors that provide syntax highlighting
could reflect such a distinction by using different visual feedback
for each (e.g. different color, font, etc.). some time in the last
few years, i suggested this be done for the interactive lisp mode in
emacs, but no one seemed to be interested in the idea and i wasn't up
to the task (i suppose what is and what isn't a special form may
depend on the flavor of lisp one may be using, but it seems possible
that something useful could be concocted).
does this idea not seem worth the effort?
will there be a guile mode? i noticed that there is some mention of
someone working on one in an old message from the archives (Subject is
something like "Scheme is too complicated").
i don't see the lack (in GNU emacs, at least). when i edit foo.scm,
symbols `and', `lambda', `define', etc. are in a different color. did
you turn on font-lock mode?
thi