This is the mail archive of the guile@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the Guile project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Representation of VM programs---applicable smobs?

To: djurfeldt at nada dot kth dot se
Subject: Representation of VM programs---applicable smobs?
From: Doug Evans <dje at transmeta dot com>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 11:44:12 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: Keisuke Nishida <kxn30 at po dot cwru dot edu>, guile at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
References: <m3wvhbcszu.fsf@indy.STUDENT.CWRU.Edu><xy766ovl6ef.fsf@mdj.nada.kth.se><m3g0ny1tps.fsf@indy.STUDENT.CWRU.Edu><xy77l9acp77.fsf@mdj.nada.kth.se><m3vgwra9sg.fsf@indy.STUDENT.CWRU.Edu><xy7itsrzewh.fsf@mdj.nada.kth.se><m3snrva25p.fsf@indy.STUDENT.CWRU.Edu><xy7g0nufro1.fsf_-_@mdj.nada.kth.se>

Mikael Djurfeldt writes:
 > What are people's opinion about adding applicable smobs to Guile?
 > (This implies adding a new entry for scm_tc7_smob in the application
 >  switches in SCM_CEVAL and SCM_DAPPLY.)

How intimately are people familiar with the implementation of Rscheme?
[I'm getting there, but have a long way to go.]

I wonder how much of what's done there will be useful to Guile
(if only to suggest ideas).

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Representation of VM programs---applicable smobs?
  - From: Mikael Djurfeldt

References:
- guile-vm-0.2
  - From: Keisuke Nishida
- Re: guile-vm-0.2
  - From: Mikael Djurfeldt
- Re: guile-vm-0.2
  - From: Keisuke Nishida
- Re: guile-vm-0.2
  - From: Mikael Djurfeldt
- Re: guile-vm-0.2
  - From: Keisuke Nishida
- Re: guile-vm-0.2
  - From: Mikael Djurfeldt
- Re: guile-vm-0.2
  - From: Keisuke Nishida
- Representation of VM programs---applicable smobs?
  - From: Mikael Djurfeldt

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]