This is the mail archive of the
guile@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the Guile project.
RE: Octave and Guile?
- To: "Daschbach, John L" <John dot Daschbach at pnl dot gov>
- Subject: RE: Octave and Guile?
- From: "John W. Eaton" <jwe at bevo dot che dot wisc dot edu>
- Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 15:42:01 -0500 (CDT)
- Cc: guile-user at gnu dot org, guile-devel at gnu dot org, rms at gnu dot org
- List-Id: <guile-user.gnu.org>
- References: <6DBB005AF9DDD31193030008C7A49DC85008ED@pnlmse8.pnl.gov>
On 14-Sep-2000, Daschbach, John L <John.Daschbach@pnl.gov> wrote:
| 2.) Why rewrite the interpreter in guile? At least to start it
| would seem better to just add the ability to evaluate scheme code in
| octave.
I'm not suggesting that Octave be rewritten in Guile. Instead, I
would modify Octave to emit Scheme code, and have Guile interpret it.
For maximum benefit to both Guile and Octave, I think they need to be
able to share all data. Based on my understanding of how things work,
it would be easier to do this if there is really only one interpreter
running at a time, and it makes more sense for that interpreter to be
Guile instead of Octave. Guile users would be able to call Octave
functions and Octave users would be able to call Guile procedures.
Life would be good.
jwe
_______________________________________________
Guile-user mailing list
Guile-user@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user