This is the mail archive of the
insight@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the Insight project.
Re: Lets rename insight to "insight" (imagine that)
- To: Fabrice Gautier <Fabrice_Gautier at sdesigns dot com>
- Subject: Re: Lets rename insight to "insight" (imagine that)
- From: "Eray Ozkural (exa)" <erayo at cs dot bilkent dot edu dot tr>
- Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2000 13:20:19 +0200
- CC: insight at sources dot redhat dot com
- Organization: Bilkent University
- References: <B1F6452C89AFD411AE0800A0CC734C23015027@EMAIL1>
- Reply-To: erayo at cs dot bilkent dot edu dot tr
Fabrice Gautier wrote:
>
>
> And I would had that debian has a mechanisme called alternatives to handle a
> case like this. It would allows to install both original gdb and insight or
> only one of them without conflict and allow you to choose which one is
> really launched by the gdb
> command.
> (Does the debian insight package use alterntives?)
>
Uh, no. It doesn't use alternatives because we don't think that a graphical
gdb is an alternative for gdb ;) Seriously, there's already gdb5.0 in a
separate package and we think that one of them is not really a replacement
for the other because there might be other programs which would assume
the pure gdb.
> This, in the end seems to be a matter of distribution.
> I don't know if there is such a mechanisme with RPMs, its quite an
> fundamental feature for Debian...
Yes, alternatives are nice. In fact I'd like to make it an alternative
for, let's say graphical-debugger. Something like that.
Thanks,
--
Eray (exa) Ozkural
Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara
e-mail: erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr
www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo