This is the mail archive of the insight@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the Insight project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[RFA] gdbtk-cmds.c: tm_print_insn



Instead of using tm_print_insn directly, we should use the
TARGET_PRINT_INSN multiarch method.
I missed this in my change.

See the thread.
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2001-08/msg00255.html
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2001-09/msg00051.html

Elena

2002-01-23  Elena Zannoni  <ezannoni@redhat.com>

        * generic/gdbtk-cmds.c (gdbtk_load_asm, gdbtk_print_asm): Use 
        TARGET_PRINT_INSN instead of tm_print_insn.


Index: gdbtk-cmds.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/uberbaum/gdb/gdbtk/generic/gdbtk-cmds.c,v
retrieving revision 1.48
diff -u -p -r1.48 gdbtk-cmds.c
--- gdbtk-cmds.c	2002/01/08 20:21:44	1.48
+++ gdbtk-cmds.c	2002/01/24 22:15:32
@@ -2005,7 +2005,7 @@ gdbtk_load_asm (clientData, pc, di)
   gdb_flush (gdb_stdout);
 
   result_ptr->obj_ptr = client_data->result_obj[2];
-  pc += (*tm_print_insn) (pc, di);
+  pc += TARGET_PRINT_INSN (pc, di);
   gdb_flush (gdb_stdout);
 
   client_data->widget_line_no++;
@@ -2074,7 +2074,7 @@ gdbtk_print_asm (clientData, pc, di)
   fputs_unfiltered ("    ", gdb_stdout);
   print_address (pc, gdb_stdout);
   fputs_unfiltered (":\t    ", gdb_stdout);
-  pc += (*tm_print_insn) (pc, di);
+  pc += TARGET_PRINT_INSN (pc, di);
   fputs_unfiltered ("\n", gdb_stdout);
   gdb_flush (gdb_stdout);
   return pc;


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]