This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Insight project.
RE: [RFC] syntax highlighting
- From: "Dave Korn" <dave dot korn at artimi dot com>
- To: <insight at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 11:01:05 +0100
- Subject: RE: [RFC] syntax highlighting
>From: Steven Johnson
>Sent: 25 August 2005 22:24
> Which would support an on going position of all major changes be in
> their own files, that are copyright assigned to the FSF, just like
> normal GDB. Then only trivial changes (hooks and the like) are in the
> Redhat code. Then (in the "dream of one day") that code wouldnt be a
> problem for an assignment. It would also be possible, that a specific
> comment could be put in such a file stating that the hooks to this code
> have also been assigned to the FSF, so that there is even less of a
> Also, it would mean if one day someone took the view or re-implementing
> all the Redhat copyright code, they wouldnt have to re-implement the
> contributed stuff.
You know, it occurs to me to wonder whether new contributions could be
assigned jointly to redhat and the fsf.
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....