This is the mail archive of the insight@sourceware.org mailing list for the Insight project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: would this be an improvement?

From: Keith Seitz <keiths at redhat dot com>
To: Torsten Mohr <tmohr at s dot netic dot de>
Cc: insight at sourceware dot org
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 13:46:41 -0700
Subject: Re: would this be an improvement?
References: <00bf01c68b09$64e9faa0$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> <200606082216.04515.tmohr@s.netic.de>

[Oh boy... Been sitting on this for several weeks now...]

Torsten Mohr wrote:

thanks for those hints.  I guess that will solve it.
I wonder why it is not contained in the latest
insight-weekly.


You know, I'd swear that I looked at this, posted a revised patch and
asked for someone to double-check it. Alas, I don't see that anywhere.
Maybe I'm hallucinating.

Anyway, this is insight/253. Looks like 263 could be the same thing.

I've commited the patch from the the mail now to make sure I don't forget about this again. I've also put it on the 6.5 branch, and I will cut a 6.5 release today.

My apologies to all those annoyed by this.

Keith

ChangeLog
2006-06-26  Keith Seitz  <keiths@redhat.com>

* library/srcwin.itb (_build_win): Add invisible frame to workaround the missing frame problem.

References:
- RE: would this be an improvement?
  - From: Dave Korn
- Re: would this be an improvement?
  - From: Torsten Mohr

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]