Re: glibc 2.1.2pre3

["George T. Talbot" <george@moberg.com>]

Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> 
> >>>>> George Talbot writes:
> 
> George> On 27 Aug 1999, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> >> "George T. Talbot" <george@moberg.com> writes:
> >>
> >> > Can this release be compiled with GCC 2.95.1 or do I have to stick with
> >> > egcs 1.1.2?
> >>
> >> Depends on the platforms.  gcc 2.95* works for platforms != Alpha.
> 
> George> OK...then I'll give it a try.  I was curious because when I recompiled
> George> 2.1.1pre2 with 2.95.1 atoll() and strtoll() broke, giving incorrect
> George> results. I was compiling with -fexceptions, so maybe this made a
> George> difference.  (platform: Linux x86)
> 
> Do you have testcases for the atoll and strtoll breakage?

Here's the program I used to test for breakage.  Kinda simple and
stupid, but it works.

--
George T. Talbot
<george@moberg.com>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <iostream.h>
#include <strstream.h>

int	main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
	long long	i = 1;
	int			passed=1;

	do
	{
		char		buf[128];
		ostrstream	wr(buf, sizeof(buf));

		wr << i << ends;

		cout << " i= " << i << " (str=\"" << wr.str() << "\")";

		long long	conv	= atoll(wr.str());

		cout << " atoll(str)=" << conv;

		if (i != conv)
		{
			cout << " ***";
			passed=0;
		}

		long long	conv2	= strtoll(wr.str(), 0, 10);
		cout << " strtoll(str, 0, 10)=" << conv2;

		if (i != conv2)
		{
			cout << " ***";
			passed=0;
		}

		istrstream	rd(wr.str());

		long long	conv3;
		rd >> conv3;

		cout << " long long operator>>(str)=" << conv3;

		if (i != conv3)
		{
			cout << " ***";
			passed=0;
		}

		cout << endl;

		i	= i << 1;
	} while (i);

	if (passed)
		cout << "Test passed." << endl;
	else
		cout << "*** TEST FAILED. ***" << endl;

	return 0;
}