This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Linux vs. libio


>>>>> "Joe" == Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.COM> writes:

    Joe> If glibc and libstdc++ are to share the same structures for
    Joe> streams/stdio, then yes, they must change in lock-step.  This
    Joe> is appropriate for *released* versions.  But for *testing*,
    Joe> it would be nice to have the *option* on Linux of saying
    Joe> "don't share i/o structures".  Enabling this option would
    Joe> break programs that rely on the C++ standard's guarantee that
    Joe> cout/stdout and cerr/stderr are synchronized (unless flush
    Joe> calls are inserted at appropriate points), and we would never
    Joe> build binary packages to be distributed in that way, though
    Joe> we could point users to this choice if they are stuck, trying
    Joe> to get new C++ code to run on a legacy Linux system, for
    Joe> instance.

Exactly!  I'm ecstatic that you intuited what I was trying to say!

    Joe> It appears that the only way to get past this impasse is to
    Joe> find a libio patch that the glibc folks would be willing to
    Joe> accept.

That's what we were working on when I asked for help yesterday.
Sadly, we haven't made much progress; I've been too busy in this email
debate! :-(

I guess the mistake was to try to do the design in this way.  Instead,
we can just complete the patch, and present the finished product for
comment, and, hopefully, approval.

Let's avoid branching, then.  How about this:

  o We'll work on -fnew-abi support in the compiler.  Checking in the
    changes may break -fnew-abi regression tests, because of libio
    problems, but people can still see the changes and test -fnew-abi
    in non I/O streams examples.

  o In parallel, we'll work on the libio patches.  We'll submit them,
    and try to get approval.  Then, we'll put them in libio, bringing
    things back to zero regression-test failures.

There's no risk: nobody is supposed to be using -fnew-abi for anything
serious right now, non-new-abi builds won't break, and we'll keep the
libios in sync.

--
Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]