libc-alpha archive
author index for January - March, 1999

This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@cygnus.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]

wuefui81@ernie.almac.co.uk (20gr8ofr)

• 1999-02-15 07:08 20 great offers!

abakun@reac.com

• 1999-02-16 08:13 snprintf and sprintf act differenting when writing to an argument

Alex Buell <alex.buell@tahallah.demon.co.uk>

• 1999-03-10 15:37 StarOffice 5 :o(
• 1999-01-22 07:45 Re: glibc 2.0.111
• 1999-01-20 04:56 Re: PATH_MAX in sys/param.h
• 1999-01-19 20:31 PATH_MAX in sys/param.h
• 1999-01-17 14:16 Re: glibc 2.0.110
• 1999-01-17 05:41 Re: glibc 2.0.110
• 1999-01-11 05:45 Re: glibc-compat-2.0.105.tar.gz?
• 1999-01-08 05:49 problems with ncurses-4.2
• 1999-01-08 05:21 Re: Problem with brk() call when using with libncurses-4.2.so
• 1999-01-08 04:08 Problem with brk() call when using with libncurses-4.2.so
• 1999-01-03 03:40 glibc-compat-2.0.105.tar.gz?

Alex Holden <alex@linuxhacker.org>

• 1999-01-31 12:13 Re: glibc 2.0.112

alex.buell@tahallah.demon.co.uk

• 1999-03-11 01:32 Re: StarOffice 5 :o(

"Alexander V. Lukyanov" <lav@alpha.netis.ru>

• 1999-01-15 09:48 segv in _dl_close

Alice Anna Reese <aareese@isn.net>

• 1999-01-30 11:30 glibcbug

Andreas Jaeger <aj@arthur.rhein-neckar.de>

• 1999-03-31 02:28 [Sergei Ivanov <svivanov@pdmi.ras.ru>] libc/1032: GLOB_ONLYDIR does not work
• 1999-03-30 09:47 timezone test for PR 1054+1056
• 1999-03-30 07:30 Another timezone problem
• 1999-03-30 02:36 timezone bug?
• 1999-03-28 22:28 Re: mkstemp
• 1999-03-28 02:38 Re: popen/pclose problem in Linux 2.2.x with vfork/glibc 2.1
• 1999-03-27 09:19 popen/pclose problem in Linux 2.2.x with vfork/glibc 2.1
• 1999-03-27 08:28 Re: Fwd: Bug#34953: Possible fix for this problem
• 1999-03-24 23:33 glibc 2.0/2.1 binary incompatibility
• 1999-03-19 11:39 Re: Can't find getutmp and getutmpx in glibc 2.1.x
• 1999-03-17 09:18 Re: Question about dynamic link
• 1999-03-16 23:47 Re: glibc 2.1.1pre1 and cvs problems
• 1999-03-15 23:42 Re: struct stat
• 1999-03-12 15:27 Re: struct stat
• 1999-03-12 12:10 Re: struct stat
• 1999-03-11 22:37 [Various] struct stat
• 1999-03-10 04:45 glibc 2.1.1pre1: Static build broken on alpha
• 1999-03-09 23:54 Re: manual/libc.texinfo on arm
• 1999-03-06 07:43 Re: [Various] Digested Articles
• 1999-03-01 00:30 Patch for PR libc/10001
• 1999-02-16 13:51 [mcculley@cuspy.com] libc/977: dlopen tries to resolve symbols even when given RTLD_LAZY
• 1999-02-15 23:28 Re: Tests for 'fdim' math function fail
• 1999-02-15 15:30 [Various] Digested Articles
• 1999-02-14 13:12 Re: Bug in 64-bit printf on PPC
• 1999-02-13 10:43 PR about glibc 2.1 with --enable-omitfp on i686
• 1999-02-10 12:49 FAQ entry
• 1999-02-07 04:29 Re: make check maths fails
• 1999-02-05 23:30 Re: linux paths.h
• 1999-02-05 01:44 Re: libm-i387 fdim bug (`gas' incompatibility)
• 1999-02-03 12:55 Re: glibc-2.0.122 test-float fails
• 1999-02-02 22:35 Re: glibc 2.0.112
• 1999-02-01 10:31 Re: linux syslog problems (now linux-2.2.1+glibc-2.0.111)
• 1999-02-01 04:29 Re: [50 character or so descriptive subject here (for reference)]
• 1999-01-31 15:47 Re: glibc 2.0.112
• 1999-01-31 12:18 Re: __OPTIMIZE__ & __ctype32_b
• 1999-01-31 08:44 Re: glibc 2.0.112
• 1999-01-30 01:46 Re: __longjmp.S
• 1999-01-23 12:56 Re: make: *** [all] Segmentation fault
• 1999-01-18 23:54 Re: egcs-1.1.1 compiling glibc-2.1 with -O99 -fomit-frame-pointer
• 1999-01-18 23:54 Re: make check fails
• 1999-01-17 13:29 Re: What needs to be recompiled when upgrading to 2.1?
• 1999-01-16 13:47 Re: 2.0.110: [/tmp/glibc/usr/share/zoneinfo/Australia/Darwin] Illegal instruction
• 1999-01-15 14:28 Re: glibc 2.0.110 failures - with Linux 2.2.0pre7
• 1999-01-15 08:40 Re: glibc 2.0.110 failures - with Linux 2.2.0pre7
• 1999-01-15 00:29 Re: make check failed on libc-2.0.110
• 1999-01-14 23:44 glibc 2.0.110 failures - with Linux 2.2.0pre7
• 1999-01-13 09:36 Re: sysdeps/i386/bits/string.h contains bogus code
• 1999-01-12 10:58 Re: What needs to be recompiled when upgrading to 2.1?
• 1999-01-07 15:16 What needs to be recompiled when upgrading to 2.1?
• 1999-01-06 06:21 Re: bug: configure don't know about 'GNU Makeinfo (Texinfo 3.9) 1.67'
• 1999-01-04 23:29 Re: samba 2.0beta5 compile problems
• 1999-01-04 23:29 Re: glibc-2.0.108/9 xstat undefined symbol, make check fails on localedata
• 1999-01-03 02:44 Re: make check failure in glibc 2.0.109
• 1999-01-01 04:41 Re: bug in sendmsg and recvmsg on linux in libc-2.0.95

Andreas Schwab <schwab@issan.informatik.uni-dortmund.de>

• 1999-03-29 16:11 Re: popen/pclose problem in Linux 2.2.x with vfork/glibc 2.1
• 1999-03-29 00:43 Re: Fwd: Bug#34953: Possible fix for this problem
• 1999-03-29 00:39 Re: popen/pclose problem in Linux 2.2.x with vfork/glibc 2.1
• 1999-03-17 17:49 Re: Question about dynamic link
• 1999-02-03 05:03 Re: dlsym SEGV in certain cases
• 1999-02-03 01:49 Re: db1 vs. db2
• 1999-02-01 01:57 Re: Bug with dlclose and static class elements
• 1999-01-29 01:24 Re: __OPTIMIZE__ & __ctype32_b
• 1999-01-20 01:49 Re: PATH_MAX in sys/param.h
• 1999-01-08 05:14 Re: Problem with brk() call when using with libncurses-4.2.so
• 1999-01-06 01:29 Re: glibc crypt extension

Angel365@hotmail.com

• 1999-03-11 13:55 Call Me!

Becky <research11@techspot.com>

• 1999-03-14 14:05 Want to find dirt on someone?

Bill Metzenthen <billm@melbpc.org.au>

• 1999-02-13 18:07 glibc-2.1 and __setfpucw

BOOMHOWER7@aol.com

• 1999-03-05 03:50 Foreclosed Homes In Your Area

"Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" <allbery@kf8nh.apk.net>

• 1999-01-16 06:20 Re: vfork specs

Byeong-ryeol Kim <jinbo21@mail.kornet.nm.kr>

• 1999-02-20 05:32 glibc-2.1 and ip_fw.h
• 1999-01-14 10:36 wctype.h

Christopher Seawood <cls@seawood.org>

• 1999-03-03 15:12 Shared lib major number

Christopher Sekiya <wileyc@sekiya.twics.co.jp>

• 1999-01-25 19:09 Re: glibc 2.0.111
• 1999-01-22 06:00 Re: glibc 2.0.111
• 1999-01-13 14:46 Belated 2.0.109 success, and a patch

cldejfdunvmjneya@hotbot.com

• 1999-02-12 23:58 FREE PSYCHIC READING!! [ugfzu]

Cristian Gafton <gafton@redhat.com>

• 1999-03-29 09:56 Re: popen/pclose problem in Linux 2.2.x with vfork/glibc 2.1
• 1999-01-13 05:47 Re: What needs to be recompiled when upgrading to 2.1?
• 1999-01-11 08:40 Re: glibc-compat-2.0.105.tar.gz?
• 1999-01-11 01:10 Re: glibc-compat-2.0.105.tar.gz?
• 1999-01-11 01:02 Re: What needs to be recompiled when upgrading to 2.1?

Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>

• 1999-03-13 14:12 Re: struct stat
• 1999-01-31 17:58 FAQ patch
• 1999-01-31 10:35 Re: glibc 2.0.112

Dave Horsfall <dave@fgh.geac.com.au>

• 1999-02-15 15:20 SPAM

"David A. Greene" <greened@eecs.umich.edu>

• 1999-03-16 06:57 Re: struct stat
• 1999-03-16 06:50 Re: struct stat
• 1999-03-16 06:47 Re: struct stat
• 1999-03-15 13:27 Re: struct stat
• 1999-03-15 12:34 Re: struct stat
• 1999-03-15 12:17 Re: struct stat
• 1999-03-15 11:40 Re: struct stat
• 1999-03-15 07:24 Re: struct stat
• 1999-03-15 07:22 Re: struct stat
• 1999-03-15 07:17 Re: struct stat
• 1999-03-15 07:16 Re: struct stat
• 1999-03-13 12:54 Re: struct stat
• 1999-03-13 10:43 Re: struct stat
• 1999-03-13 10:40 Re: struct stat
• 1999-03-13 10:36 Re: struct stat
• 1999-03-13 10:33 Re: struct stat

David Edelsohn <dje@watson.ibm.com>

• 1999-02-10 15:25 glibc-2.1 on PowerPC cannot disable floating-point

David Greene <greened@eecs.umich.edu>

• 1999-03-12 14:03 Re: struct stat

David Miller <davem@twiddle.net>

• 1999-03-10 16:27 Re: StarOffice 5 :o(

"David S. Miller" <davem@dm.cobaltmicro.com>

• 1999-01-30 04:41 Re: glibc 2.0.112
• 1999-01-30 01:40 Re: __longjmp.S
• 1999-01-28 02:58 Re: __OPTIMIZE__ & __ctype32_b
• 1999-01-18 17:42 Re: vfork glibc clarification
• 1999-01-18 16:39 Re: vfork glibc clarification

Dmitry O Panov <dmitry@tsu.tula.ru>

• 1999-02-02 06:36 Re: glibc-2.0.111: getpwuid() result depends on nscd presence in nis+ environment
• 1999-01-31 01:31 glibc-2.0.111: getpwuid() result depends on nscd presence in nis+ environment
• 1999-01-25 05:43 Re: nscd problem in glibc-2.0.111
• 1999-01-24 03:27 Re: nscd problem in glibc-2.0.111
• 1999-01-23 06:08 nscd problem in glibc-2.0.111

Dominik Kubla <dominik.kubla@uni-mainz.de>

• 1999-01-30 03:21 Re: glibc 2.0.112
• 1999-01-25 12:49 Re: glibc 2.0.111
• 1999-01-24 13:00 Re: glibc 2.0.111

Eirikur Hjartarson <eiki@inet.uni2.dk>

• 1999-01-14 18:42 glibc-2.0.110 install error (timezone)

eri3829@yahoo.com

• 1999-01-20 12:19 your site

ebiederm+eric@ccr.net (Eric W. Biederman)

• 1999-02-04 01:47 Re: Bug with dlclose and static class elements

ernst@mibi02.meb.uni-bonn.de

• 1999-01-28 04:54 glibc-2.0.111: undefined reference to `__register_frame_info'

Ernst Molitor <ernst@mibi02.meb.uni-bonn.de>

• 1999-01-29 04:43 Re: glibc-2.0.111: undefined reference to `__register_frame_info'

"Eugene M. Indenbom" <bom@classic.iki.rssi.ru>

• 1999-02-09 04:37 glibc2.1 and Xlib compiled with glibc2.0 (libio incompatibility)
• 1999-02-04 22:42 libm-i387 fdim bug (`gas' incompatibility)

feanor@cassis.gyptis.frmug.org

• 1999-02-03 12:35 getpwuid_r in nss_files always returning ENOENT

Fenglou Mao <mao@csb0.IPC.PKU.EDU.CN>

• 1999-01-16 06:00 gcc path question!
• 1999-01-15 21:32 Re: glibc 2.0.110
• 1999-01-15 21:05 Re: glibc 2.0.110
• 1999-01-14 17:53 Re: glibc 2.0.110

"Fran" <paul.nilton@usa.net>

• 1999-03-17 23:02 FREE, unlimited Internet access

Franz Sirl <Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com>

• 1999-02-16 03:34 Re: Bug in 64-bit printf on PPC
• 1999-02-15 14:44 Re: Bug in 64-bit printf on PPC
• 1999-02-15 10:56 Re: Bug in 64-bit printf on PPC
• 1999-02-14 10:22 Bug in 64-bit printf on PPC
• 1999-01-29 02:54 Re: __OPTIMIZE__ & __ctype32_b
• 1999-01-28 01:31 Re: __OPTIMIZE__ & __ctype32_b

Frchasfb@aol.com

• 1999-02-12 05:10 Re Your requested info.

Gary Goodger <gmg@pe.net>

• 1999-01-29 21:46 Success w/glibc-2.0.112
• 1999-01-14 18:48 make check failed on libc-2.0.110

gcatenaz@g26.ethz.ch

• 1999-01-06 03:27 bug: configure don't know about 'GNU Makeinfo (Texinfo 3.9) 1.67'

Gene McCulley <mcculley@coral.cuspy.com>

• 1999-02-17 06:48 Re: [mcculley@cuspy.com] libc/977: dlopen tries to resolve symbols even when given RTLD_LAZY

Geoff Keating <geoffk@ozemail.com.au>

• 1999-03-17 20:21 Re: glibc-2.1.1 from cvs
• 1999-03-16 16:26 Re: struct stat
• 1999-03-15 19:36 Re: struct stat
• 1999-03-15 19:35 Re: struct stat
• 1999-03-13 23:47 Re: struct stat
• 1999-03-13 23:43 Re: struct stat
• 1999-03-12 19:43 Re: struct stat
• 1999-02-21 18:06 Re: glibc-2.1 and ip_fw.h
• 1999-02-19 16:54 Re: CVS builds
• 1999-02-17 01:17 Re: [mcculley@cuspy.com] libc/977: dlopen tries to resolve symbols even when given RTLD_LAZY
• 1999-02-15 19:24 Re: Bug in 64-bit printf on PPC
• 1999-02-13 18:57 Version 2.1.pre1 of the crypt extension
• 1999-02-12 17:23 Re: glibc-2.1 on PowerPC cannot disable floating-point
• 1999-02-12 16:52 Re: glibc-2.1 on PowerPC cannot disable floating-point
• 1999-02-08 22:23 Re: FTP site for crypt code
• 1999-01-29 19:30 Re: __OPTIMIZE__ and str*() functions
• 1999-01-22 22:07 glibc-crypt 2.0.111
• 1999-01-17 18:24 Re: glibc 2.0.110
• 1999-01-15 22:48 Re: glibc 2.0.110
• 1999-01-15 22:35 Re: vfork specs
• 1999-01-14 02:23 Re: What needs to be recompiled when upgrading to 2.1?
• 1999-01-03 16:13 glibc crypt extension
• 1999-01-01 21:06 Re: more glibc 2.0.109 fails on linuxppc
• 1999-01-01 21:06 Re: va_dcl

biy48@esbs.u-strasbg.fr (geopsik)

• 1999-02-15 06:08 Free software info!

Gordon Matzigkeit <gord@trick.fig.org>

• 1999-01-11 05:30 Re: glibc-2.0.109: some manual files shouldn't be in the distribution
• 1999-01-10 20:38 glibc-2.0.109: some manual files shouldn't be in the distribution

hjl@lucon.org (H.J. Lu)

• 1999-02-16 15:46 Re: [mcculley@cuspy.com] libc/977: dlopen tries to resolve symbols even when given RTLD_LAZY
• 1999-01-31 07:13 Re: some 2.0.112 results
• 1999-01-09 16:55 Re: GNU libio vs. GNU stdio.
• 1999-01-09 10:10 Re: GNU libio vs. GNU stdio.
• 1999-01-09 08:46 Re: GNU libio vs. GNU stdio.

Harald Hoyer <Harald.Hoyer@hot.spotline.de>

• 1999-01-28 05:59 Bug with dlclose and static class elements

Horst von Brand <vonbrand@sleipnir.valparaiso.cl>

• 1999-01-14 01:19 egcs-19990112 crash building glibc-2.0.109
• 1999-01-13 06:03 Re: What needs to be recompiled when upgrading to 2.1?
• 1999-01-11 18:39 Re: /usr/include/bits/in.h is invalid C++
• 1999-01-11 03:09 Re: /usr/include/bits/in.h is invalid C++
• 1999-01-10 17:55 /usr/include/bits/in.h is invalid C++
• 1999-01-01 14:02 Re: bug in sendmsg and recvmsg on linux in libc-2.0.95

humidors@ces.kyutech.ac.jp

• 1999-03-08 07:29 SPANISH CEDAR CIGAR HUMIDORS !

j.saito@wanadoo.fr

• 1999-01-30 16:34 make check failure

Jack Cummings <sauron@angband.ee.ualberta.ca>

• 1999-02-02 04:19 get_myaddress

"Jack Howarth" <howarth@bromo.med.uc.edu>

• 1999-02-12 08:16 spam
• 1999-01-18 07:51 vfork glibc clarification
• 1999-01-03 11:12 samba 2.0beta5 compile problems

James Antill <james@and.org>

• 1999-03-15 15:23 poll emulation
• 1999-02-02 08:48 db1 vs. db2

jason@gobills.com

• 1999-01-23 10:45 make: *** [all] Segmentation fault

"Jason P Schanuel" <jason@gobills.com>

• 1999-01-23 10:47 glibc build bug

jbailey@phn.ca

• 1999-02-03 16:43 Corrections to glibc-2.0.112 Solaris errlist stuff.
• 1999-01-28 12:56 Patch against 2.0.111 for solaris2.

"Jeff Bailey" <Jbailey@phn.ca>

• 1999-03-11 00:09 Notes on Sparc/Solaris 2.6 stuff
• 1999-02-28 16:25 Use of GLibc code in other programs.
• 1999-01-29 23:55 __longjmp.S
• 1999-01-28 17:22 Re: Patch against 2.0.111 for solaris2.
• 1999-01-28 13:12 Re: libio/genops.c: list_all_lock
• 1999-01-28 11:27 libio/genops.c: list_all_lock
• 1999-01-09 00:18 GNU libio vs. GNU stdio.

Jesse Thilo <Jesse.Thilo@pobox.com>

• 1999-01-30 05:11 [50 character or so descriptive subject here (for reference)]

JhsH20polo@aol.com

• 1999-03-14 16:22 Type Your Subject here.

jiedeazi10@urix2.uni-muenster.de

• 1999-03-20 11:34 ADV: CABLE DESCRAMBLER ...Now Only $7.00!

"Joe" <globis@netnet.com.sg>

• 1999-02-26 19:33 CNN Told the World about us!

Joel Klecker <jk@espy.org>

• 1999-03-30 19:44 [PATCH] Small fix forsysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sparc/sparc32/Makefile
• 1999-03-27 08:57 Re: Fwd: Bug#34953: Possible fix for this problem
• 1999-03-25 06:50 Fwd: Bug#34953: Possible fix for this problem
• 1999-03-25 06:50 Fwd: Bug#35023: libc6: C++ incompatibility bug
• 1999-03-18 18:37 tzdata 1999b available
• 1999-01-01 08:41 Re: bug in sendmsg and recvmsg on linux in libc-2.0.95

"John" <paul.nilton@usa.net>

• 1999-03-17 05:41 BECOME A MILLIONARES IN ONE MONTH

John Kennedy <jk@csuchico.edu>

• 1999-02-02 14:52 Re: linux syslog problems (now linux-2.2.1+glibc-2.0.112)
• 1999-02-02 10:14 Re: linux syslog problems (now linux-2.2.1+glibc-2.0.112)
• 1999-02-01 15:17 Re: linux syslog problems (now linux-2.2.1+glibc-2.0.111)
• 1999-02-01 06:04 linux syslog problems (now linux-2.2.1+glibc-2.0.111)
• 1999-01-30 16:30 Re: libresolv/poll() problems
• 1999-01-30 10:46 libresolv/poll() problems
• 1999-01-26 13:31 Re: glibc-crypt 2.0.111
• 1999-01-23 22:03 Re: glibc-crypt 2.0.111
• 1999-01-23 21:57 Re: glibc-crypt 2.0.111
• 1999-01-23 17:38 Re: glibc-crypt 2.0.111
• 1999-01-23 17:03 Re: glibc-crypt 2.0.111
• 1999-01-18 08:46 Re: 2.0.110: [/tmp/glibc/usr/share/zoneinfo/Australia/Darwin] Illegal instruction
• 1999-01-16 11:57 2.0.110: [/tmp/glibc/usr/share/zoneinfo/Australia/Darwin] Illegal instruction

"Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>

• 1999-01-18 23:28 Re: glibc optimizations and x86 variants
• 1999-01-18 16:10 glibc optimizations and x86 variants

Junichi Saito <j.saito@wanadoo.fr>

• 1999-03-15 00:39 'make check' failure

Kaoru Fukui <k_fukui@highway.ne.jp>

• 1999-03-17 18:39 glibc-2.1.1 from cvs

Kars de Jong <jongk@cs.utwente.nl>

• 1999-02-03 05:05 Re: dlsym SEGV in certain cases
• 1999-02-03 03:21 dlsym SEGV in certain cases
• 1999-01-29 05:11 Runtime failure of glibc 2.0 compiled programs with glibc 2.1

Katy753@hotmail.com

• 1999-03-30 16:34 Did you know that...

Kenneth Johansson <erakeon@kieray1.p.y.ki.era.ericsson.se>

• 1999-02-12 06:01 Re: glibc-2.1 on PowerPC cannot disable floating-point

Kunihiro Ishiguro <kunihiro@zebra.org>

• 1999-01-15 08:20 glibc-2.0.110 and Hurd

Laszlo Vecsey <master@internexus.net>

• 1999-02-12 14:57 glibc 2.1, not available anymore?

Lin Zhe Min <ljm@marx.ljm.wownet.net>

• 1999-01-17 00:18 Re: glibc 2.0.110

"Lou" <meg98@hotbot.com>

• 1999-02-25 12:28 YOUR TELEPHONE ON HOLD ADVERTISING

"M.H.VanLeeuwen" <vanl@lucent.com>

• 1999-02-02 14:03 glibc 2.0.112

"MacGyver" <macgyver@tos.net>

• 1999-02-12 18:44 RE: glibc 2.1, not available anymore?
• 1999-02-10 15:16 RE: FAQ entry
• 1999-01-17 12:16 RE: glibc 2.0.110

mack@ncifcrf.gov

• 1999-01-02 13:33 glibc-2.0.108/9 xstat undefined symbol, make check fails on localedata

Mark Kettenis <kettenis@wins.uva.nl>

• 1999-03-30 11:55 Re: Another timezone problem
• 1999-03-21 11:59 Re: Can't find getutmp and getutmpx in glibc 2.1.x
• 1999-03-15 15:00 Re: struct stat
• 1999-03-15 12:41 Re: struct stat
• 1999-03-15 11:05 Re: struct stat
• 1999-03-13 15:43 Re: struct stat
• 1999-03-13 12:31 Re: struct stat
• 1999-03-12 15:26 Re: struct stat
• 1999-01-17 07:45 Re: glibc 2.0.110
• 1999-01-09 12:08 Re: GNU libio vs. GNU stdio.

martin@mira.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de

• 1999-03-10 16:15 libc.info generation fails
• 1999-01-02 07:12 glibc breaks readline
• 1999-01-02 06:41 nscd does not work

"Martin v. Loewis" <martin@mira.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de>

• 1999-03-15 15:52 Re: struct stat
• 1999-03-12 02:50 Re: [Various] struct stat
• 1999-03-11 00:05 Re: libc.info generation fails
• 1999-02-03 02:39 Re: one more resolv patch
• 1999-02-03 01:32 Re: More on nscd problem
• 1999-02-02 15:23 More on nscd problem
• 1999-02-02 00:38 Re: Bug with dlclose and static class elements
• 1999-02-01 15:37 Re: Bug with dlclose and static class elements
• 1999-02-01 15:28 Re: Bug with dlclose and static class elements
• 1999-01-23 03:32 Re: glibc 2.0.110
• 1999-01-17 04:12 Re: /usr/include/bits/in.h is invalid C++

matt.white@peri.com (Matthew White)

• 1999-01-06 16:37 No Subject

matumura@ialab.cs.kitami-it.ac.jp

• 1999-01-25 19:00 localedef problem

michael.schaefer@dlr.de

• 1999-01-23 10:43 putgrent writes incorrect /etc/group

mrs@wrs.com (Mike Stump)

• 1999-02-01 13:52 Re: Bug with dlclose and static class elements

mmaureraks@st-wendel.de

• 1999-02-01 01:13 [50 character or so descriptive subject here (for reference)]

MooreD68@aol.com

• 1999-03-12 16:59 !! Wanted Home Product Assemblers !!

"Pablo Frank" <pfrank@nortelnetworks.com>

• 1999-03-19 11:31 Can't find getutmp and getutmpx in glibc 2.1.x
• 1999-03-19 08:38 Can't find getutmp and getutmpx in glibc 2.1.x

paru2945@yahoo.com

• 1999-03-18 16:20 re your web site

Paul Eggert <eggert@twinsun.com>

• 1999-03-29 13:43 Re: popen/pclose problem in Linux 2.2.x with vfork/glibc 2.1

Paul Kimoto <kimoto@spacenet.tn.cornell.edu>

• 1999-01-31 11:01 glibc-2.0.112 - "make check" failures on fdim et al., and minor errors

pb@nexus.co.uk

• 1999-03-10 18:52 Re: StarOffice 5 :o(

Pete Wyckoff <wyckoff@ca.sandia.gov>

• 1999-03-27 18:01 Re: popen/pclose problem in Linux 2.2.x with vfork/glibc 2.1

Philip Blundell <pb@nexus.co.uk>

• 1999-02-22 01:50 Re: glibc-2.1 and ip_fw.h
• 1999-02-21 12:19 Re: glibc-2.1 and ip_fw.h
• 1999-01-31 09:07 Re: some 2.0.112 results
• 1999-01-30 14:13 some 2.0.112 results
• 1999-01-19 02:03 Re: 2.0.110: [/tmp/glibc/usr/share/zoneinfo/Australia/Darwin] Illegal instruction
• 1999-01-15 03:24 Re: glibc 2.0.110 failures - with Linux 2.2.0pre7
• 1999-01-08 06:42 Re: Problem with brk() call when using with libncurses-4.2.so
• 1999-01-05 10:07 Re: I think ip6.h should change
• 1999-01-03 16:03 Re: I think ip6.h should change

kthomas@gwdg.de (Philipp Thomas)

• 1999-03-29 12:45 Processor specific code in glibc

Philippe Troin <phil@fifi.org>

• 1999-02-01 16:55 Re: Bug with dlclose and static class elements
• 1999-02-01 13:51 Re: Bug with dlclose and static class elements
• 1999-01-17 11:03 Re: segv in _dl_close

Prasong Aroonruviwat <psa@jesus.ksc.co.th>

• 1999-02-01 21:28 [50 character or so descriptive subject here (for reference)]

qball@darkphiber.org

• 1999-02-15 17:32 RE: SPAM

QingLong <qinglong@Bolizm.ihep.su>

• 1999-01-29 15:07 Building & installing glibc2 from read-only sources.

rachel_g_246@hotmail.com

• 1999-02-10 22:34 Waiting to hear from you

Ragnar Hojland Espinosa <ragnar@redestb.es>

• 1999-01-31 11:35 Re: Problem building 2.0.111.. bug?
• 1999-01-23 07:29 Problem building 2.0.111.. bug?

Richard Henderson <rth@cygnus.com>

• 1999-01-31 12:01 Re: glibc 2.0.112
• 1999-01-30 12:50 Re: glibc 2.0.112

rjf@zero-ping.com

• 1999-01-30 17:42 [50 character or so descriptive subject here (for reference)]

rmccask@biby.com

• 1999-02-06 08:28 6 errors found in testing float with libc-2.0.112

"Rob" <m.stone@eudoramail.com>

• 1999-03-12 22:15 $100,000+ FIRST YEAR INCOME

Rocnwolf27@aol.com

• 1999-02-12 06:33 Home Based Positions Now Available Worldwide

Rod Stewart <stewart@zhadum.nexus.carleton.ca>

• 1999-03-09 22:14 Re: manual/libc.texinfo on arm
• 1999-03-09 21:42 manual/libc.texinfo on arm
• 1999-01-25 12:48 Re: config.sub problem on armv4l
• 1999-01-25 08:48 config.sub problem on armv4l
• 1999-01-15 15:25 README file and crypt

Roland McGrath <roland@frob.com>

• 1999-03-11 05:36 Re: libc.info generation fails
• 1999-01-16 00:44 Re: vfork specs
• 1999-01-15 12:24 Re: vfork specs
• 1999-01-12 23:46 Re: What needs to be recompiled when upgrading to 2.1?
• 1999-01-09 21:31 Re: GNU libio vs. GNU stdio.

"Ron" <melg98@eudoramail.com>

• 1999-02-28 18:55 INCREASE YOUR SALES!!!

ronald@forte-intl.com

• 1999-01-26 16:50 make install fails on glibc-2.0.111
• 1999-01-20 11:07 [50 character or so descriptive subject here (for reference)]

Ronald Cole <ronald@forte-intl.com>

• 1999-01-18 11:50 make check fails

root <root@shawc.demon.co.uk>

• 1999-02-06 16:44 make check maths fails

Scott Bambrough <scottb@corelcomputer.com>

• 1999-01-25 11:39 Re: config.sub problem on armv4l

sew@ces.kyutech.ac.jp

• 1999-03-05 01:30 Unsold Orders of SEWING MACHINES !

Shinya Hanataka <hanataka@abyss.rim.or.jp>

• 1999-03-03 08:58 wcsmbsload ignore lowercase charset alias
• 1999-01-23 23:56 localedef can not treat multi byte characters
• 1999-01-16 03:17 ISO-2022-JP-2 latin character encode bug

Siamand@aol.com

• 1999-02-17 19:43 Low Cost Services!

srussell@worldscope.co.uk (Simon Russell)

• 1999-02-15 15:48 Tests for 'fdim' math function fail

skimo@pool.gv.kotnet.org

• 1999-02-03 10:13 glibc-2.0.122 test-float fails

SL Baur <steve@xemacs.org>

• 1999-01-15 12:30 Re: [50 character or so descriptive subject here (for reference)]
• 1999-01-15 11:55 Re: glibc 2.0.110 failures - with Linux 2.2.0pre7
• 1999-01-15 00:16 Re: [50 character or so descriptive subject here (for reference)]
• 1999-01-15 00:00 Re: glibc 2.0.110 failures - with Linux 2.2.0pre7
• 1999-01-14 23:45 Re: [50 character or so descriptive subject here (for reference)]
• 1999-01-14 22:51 Re: [50 character or so descriptive subject here (for reference)]
• 1999-01-14 20:08 [50 character or so descriptive subject here (for reference)]

smoke_houses@express.co.jp

• 1999-03-08 02:34 SPANISH CEDAR CIGAR HUMIDORS !!

Stanislav Brabec <utx@k332.feld.cvut.cz>

• 1999-01-18 13:18 egcs-1.1.1 compiling glibc-2.1 with -O99 -fomit-frame-pointer

Stanislav Meduna <stanom@etm.co.at>

• 1999-02-09 00:46 AW: gettext wrappers missing in sunrpc
• 1999-02-06 08:08 gettext wrappers missing in sunrpc
• 1999-01-17 10:47 Re: glibc 2.0.110
• 1999-01-16 01:41 Re: vfork specs

Stephane Rehel <rehel@worldnet.fr>

• 1999-01-19 14:59 Bug or feature in dlsym()? Makes Mozilla/NGLayout crash at startup.

Stig Venaas <venaas@nvg.ntnu.no>

• 1999-02-13 15:48 Re: PR about glibc 2.1 with --enable-omitfp on i686
• 1999-01-03 05:15 I think ip6.h should change
• 1999-01-01 10:19 Re: bug in sendmsg and recvmsg on linux in libc-2.0.95
• 1999-01-01 03:00 bug in sendmsg and recvmsg on linux in libc-2.0.95

STUDDD8@aol.com

• 1999-02-18 16:13 Mail Order Know-How!

sur818s@yahoo.com

• 1999-02-22 19:17 Your Free Online 1,800 Page Y2K Report

Tedonzong@aol.com

• 1999-02-21 22:19 Profit From The Internet Growth-Explosion 800 607-6006 Ex 2492

tb@mit.edu (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)

• 1999-03-15 21:12 Re: struct stat
• 1999-03-15 11:30 Re: struct stat

Thomas Quinot <thomas@Cuivre.FR.EU.ORG>

• 1999-01-27 23:42 2.0.111: sys/timex.h should define MAXTC
• 1999-01-21 06:41 Problem with 'make subdir_install' in glibc-2.0.110/manual

Thorsten Kukuk <kukuk@suse.de>

• 1999-02-02 08:30 Re: glibc-2.0.111: getpwuid() result depends on nscd presence in nis+ environment
• 1999-02-02 06:23 Re: get_myaddress
• 1999-02-01 23:40 Re: glibc-2.0.111: getpwuid() result depends on nscd presence in nis+ environment
• 1999-01-18 23:57 Re: make check fails
• 1999-01-01 05:09 Re: bug in sendmsg and recvmsg on linux in libc-2.0.95

Tom Rini <tmrini@ntplx.net>

• 1999-01-14 23:23 Re: make check failed on libc-2.0.110

Torsten Duwe <duwe@ns.lst.de>

• 1999-02-09 02:01 Re: FTP site for crypt code
• 1999-02-08 07:33 FTP site for crypt code
• 1999-01-29 02:33 Re: 2.0.111: sys/timex.h should define MAXTC

tqnvihtdibbaevws@hotbot.com

• 1999-02-11 22:28 FREE PSYCHIC READING!! [gonnl]

trth99@aol.com

• 1999-03-06 21:41 Just Do It !! $7 Investment Nets Thousands !!

Tung-Han Hsieh <thhsieh@twcpro.phys.ntu.edu.tw>

• 1999-03-17 07:41 Question about dynamic link

twentysomething@girlszzzshacks.com

• 1999-03-19 00:18 ADULT ONLY!!!!! - requested material

Ulrich Drepper <drepper@cygnus.com>

• 1999-03-30 18:36 Re: Another timezone problem
• 1999-03-29 14:35 Re: Processor specific code in glibc
• 1999-03-29 10:03 Re: popen/pclose problem in Linux 2.2.x with vfork/glibc 2.1
• 1999-03-29 09:18 Re: popen/pclose problem in Linux 2.2.x with vfork/glibc 2.1
• 1999-03-19 23:19 Re: tzdata 1999b available
• 1999-03-17 08:37 Re: Question about dynamic link
• 1999-03-12 14:30 Re: struct stat
• 1999-03-11 00:12 Re: libc.info generation fails
• 1999-03-09 22:18 Re: manual/libc.texinfo on arm
• 1999-03-09 22:09 glibc-2.1.1pre1
• 1999-03-08 18:16 Re: Use of GLibc code in other programs.
• 1999-03-01 07:21 Re: Patch for PR libc/10001
• 1999-02-16 16:27 Re: [mcculley@cuspy.com] libc/977: dlopen tries to resolve symbols even when given RTLD_LAZY
• 1999-02-16 16:09 Re: [mcculley@cuspy.com] libc/977: dlopen tries to resolve symbols even when given RTLD_LAZY
• 1999-02-16 12:14 Re: Corrections to glibc-2.0.112 Solaris errlist stuff.
• 1999-02-16 08:46 Re: snprintf and sprintf act differenting when writing to an argument
• 1999-02-13 18:57 Re: glibc-2.1 and __setfpucw
• 1999-02-12 16:04 Re: glibc 2.1, not available anymore?
• 1999-02-12 08:57 Re: spam
• 1999-02-08 22:08 Re: gettext wrappers missing in sunrpc
• 1999-02-06 12:10 glibc 2.1
• 1999-02-06 08:26 FTP site for crypt code
• 1999-02-04 23:44 Re: libm-i387 fdim bug (`gas' incompatibility)
• 1999-02-03 13:53 Re: getpwuid_r in nss_files always returning ENOENT
• 1999-02-03 10:33 Re: dlsym SEGV in certain cases
• 1999-02-03 07:48 Re: one more resolv patch
• 1999-02-02 18:06 one more resolv patch
• 1999-02-02 17:30 Re: More on nscd problem
• 1999-02-01 09:28 Re: FAQ patch
• 1999-01-30 18:15 Re: make check failure
• 1999-01-30 13:10 Re: glibcbug
• 1999-01-30 08:16 Re: [50 character or so descriptive subject here (for reference)]
• 1999-01-30 08:07 Re: glibc 2.0.112
• 1999-01-29 17:31 glibc 2.0.112
• 1999-01-29 17:21 Re: Building & installing glibc2 from read-only sources.
• 1999-01-29 09:09 Re: Runtime failure of glibc 2.0 compiled programs with glibc 2.1
• 1999-01-28 16:45 Re: Patch against 2.0.111 for solaris2.
• 1999-01-28 12:58 Re: glibc-2.0.111: undefined reference to `__register_frame_info'
• 1999-01-28 12:56 Re: 2.0.111: sys/timex.h should define MAXTC
• 1999-01-28 11:36 Re: libio/genops.c: list_all_lock
• 1999-01-26 16:04 Re: glibc-crypt 2.0.111
• 1999-01-25 21:05 Re: localedef problem
• 1999-01-25 10:03 Re: config.sub problem on armv4l
• 1999-01-24 11:10 Re: CVS source error
• 1999-01-24 10:27 Re: nscd problem in glibc-2.0.111
• 1999-01-24 09:20 Re: localedef can not treat multi byte characters
• 1999-01-23 23:22 Re: glibc-crypt 2.0.111
• 1999-01-23 22:39 Re: putgrent writes incorrect /etc/group
• 1999-01-23 18:42 Re: glibc-crypt 2.0.111
• 1999-01-23 12:43 Re: make: *** [all] Segmentation fault
• 1999-01-23 11:03 Re: nscd problem in glibc-2.0.111
• 1999-01-23 09:19 Re: Problem building 2.0.111.. bug?
• 1999-01-21 18:08 glibc 2.0.111
• 1999-01-20 16:00 Re: [50 character or so descriptive subject here (for reference)]
• 1999-01-20 11:50 Re: What needs to be recompiled when upgrading to 2.1?
• 1999-01-20 10:30 Re: Bug or feature in dlsym()? Makes Mozilla/NGLayout crash at startup.
• 1999-01-19 22:09 Re: PATH_MAX in sys/param.h
• 1999-01-18 17:46 Re: glibc optimizations and x86 variants
• 1999-01-18 17:06 Re: vfork glibc clarification
• 1999-01-18 08:36 Re: vfork glibc clarification
• 1999-01-17 11:11 Re: segv in _dl_close
• 1999-01-16 18:40 Re: ISO-2022-JP-2 latin character encode bug
• 1999-01-16 16:44 Re: segv in _dl_close
• 1999-01-15 22:59 Re: glibc 2.0.110
• 1999-01-15 22:47 Re: glibc 2.0.110
• 1999-01-15 21:08 Re: glibc 2.0.110
• 1999-01-15 16:29 Re: README file and crypt
• 1999-01-15 13:32 Re: [50 character or so descriptive subject here (for reference)]
• 1999-01-15 13:04 Re: glibc 2.0.110 failures - with Linux 2.2.0pre7
• 1999-01-15 10:38 Re: glibc 2.0.110 failures - with Linux 2.2.0pre7
• 1999-01-15 09:58 vfork specs
• 1999-01-15 07:41 Re: [50 character or so descriptive subject here (for reference)]
• 1999-01-15 00:00 Re: [50 character or so descriptive subject here (for reference)]
• 1999-01-14 23:28 Re: make check failed on libc-2.0.110
• 1999-01-14 23:22 Re: [50 character or so descriptive subject here (for reference)]
• 1999-01-14 23:20 Re: make check failed on libc-2.0.110
• 1999-01-14 22:47 Re: [50 character or so descriptive subject here (for reference)]
• 1999-01-14 22:40 Re: glibc-2.0.110 install error (timezone)
• 1999-01-14 20:26 Re: make check failed on libc-2.0.110
• 1999-01-14 18:03 Re: glibc 2.0.110
• 1999-01-14 14:06 glibc 2.0.110
• 1999-01-14 08:38 Re: egcs-19990112 crash building glibc-2.0.109
• 1999-01-14 00:01 Re: FYI: net_{get,adj}time() for glibc-2.0.7 and Linux
• 1999-01-13 10:36 Re: revised glibc patch for ntp_{adj,get}time
• 1999-01-12 12:47 Re: What needs to be recompiled when upgrading to 2.1?
• 1999-01-11 18:45 Re: /usr/include/bits/in.h is invalid C++
• 1999-01-11 08:53 Re: /usr/include/bits/in.h is invalid C++
• 1999-01-10 22:53 Re: glibc-2.0.109: some manual files shouldn't be in the distribution
• 1999-01-10 20:37 Re: /usr/include/bits/in.h is invalid C++
• 1999-01-09 10:13 Re: GNU libio vs. GNU stdio.
• 1999-01-09 09:59 Re: GNU libio vs. GNU stdio.
• 1999-01-08 08:34 Re: Problem with brk() call when using with libncurses-4.2.so
• 1999-01-07 23:42 Re: glibc-2.0.7: patch for ntp_{get,adj}time
• 1999-01-07 11:12 Re: glibc-2.0.7: patch for ntp_{get,adj}time
• 1999-01-02 08:17 Re: nscd does not work
• 1999-01-01 10:08 Re: bug in sendmsg and recvmsg on linux in libc-2.0.95

"Ulrich Windl" <ulrich.windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>

• 1999-01-13 23:52 Re: FYI: net_{get,adj}time() for glibc-2.0.7 and Linux
• 1999-01-11 23:54 revised glibc patch for ntp_{adj,get}time
• 1999-01-07 23:14 Re: glibc-2.0.7: patch for ntp_{get,adj}time

Unlucky136@aol.com

• 1999-02-15 02:57 requested

VCap99@aol.com

• 1999-02-27 10:09 ADV: Dont Miss This Fantastic Opportunity

vherva@netspan.fi

• 1999-02-22 15:36 [50 character or so descriptive subject here (for reference)]

Wesley Morgan <morganw@engr.sc.edu>

• 1999-03-16 17:59 glibc 2.1.1pre1 and cvs problems
• 1999-02-18 22:48 CVS builds
• 1999-02-05 19:51 linux paths.h
• 1999-01-24 09:34 CVS source error

Zack Weinberg <zack@rabi.columbia.edu>

• 1999-03-04 17:13 Re: Shared lib major number
• 1999-02-12 15:45 Re: glibc 2.1, not available anymore?
• 1999-02-12 07:05 Re: glibc-2.1 on PowerPC cannot disable floating-point
• 1999-02-05 20:23 Re: linux paths.h
• 1999-02-03 11:17 Re: glibc-2.0.122 test-float fails
• 1999-01-25 11:23 Re: config.sub problem on armv4l
• 1999-01-24 14:32 Re: glibc 2.0.111
• 1999-01-14 19:38 Re: glibc 2.0.110
• 1999-01-14 15:23 Re: egcs-19990112 crash building glibc-2.0.109
• 1999-01-12 14:36 Re: What needs to be recompiled when upgrading to 2.1?
• 1999-01-01 11:33 Re: more glibc 2.0.109 fails on linuxppc

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]