This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@cygnus.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: glibc 2.0.112
- To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@cygnus.com>
- Subject: Re: glibc 2.0.112
- From: Dominik Kubla <dominik.kubla@uni-mainz.de>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jan 1999 08:28:57 +0100
- Cc: GNU libc testers <libc-alpha@cygnus.com>, VGER gcc list <linux-gcc@vger.rutgers.edu>
- References: <r2zp714kel.fsf@happy.cygnus.com>
On Fri, Jan 29, 1999 at 05:30:26PM -0800, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> I've uploaded the last (I'm honest!) test release of glibc 2.1 to
...
> The differences between 2.0.111 and 2.0.112 are almost exclusively bug
> fixes and the size of the diff is again caused mainly by documentation
> changes.
>
> We don't know about any bugs, except those which are mentioned in the
> BUGS file which will not be fixed for 2.1.
Hmm. What about the regression-test failures of the math stuff on
Alpha and SPARC i reported for 2.1.111? From what you write i should
not expect them to go away with 2.1.112... Any suggestion what i could
try to narrow the cause of them? I will not install a libc which fails
the provided tests.
Dominik Kubla