This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: __gmon_start__ issues between 2.1.x and 2.2.x on sparc(?)

To: Ben Collins <bcollins at debian dot org>
Subject: Re: __gmon_start__ issues between 2.1.x and 2.2.x on sparc(?)
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 22:33:06 +0100
Cc: Franz Sirl <Franz dot Sirl-kernel at lauterbach dot com>, Ulrich Drepper <drepper at cygnus dot com>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>
References: <m3zofitu8t.fsf@otr.mynet.cygnus.com> <5.0.2.1.2.20010219190548.03001008@mail.lauterbach.com> <m3zofitu8t.fsf@otr.mynet.cygnus.com> <20010219132242.S345@visi.net> <5.0.2.1.2.20010219193313.0315a008@mail.lauterbach.com> <20010219134651.U345@visi.net>
Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>

On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 01:46:51PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> Ok, I think I've narrowed down the possible recompiles I need for our
> upgrade, and yes, dpkg/apt supports that sort of versioned relationship.
> 
> Now to get binutils fixed for elf32-sparc, and I guess elf64-sparc while
> I'm at it.

I'll look into this tonight.

	Jakub

Follow-Ups:
- Re: __gmon_start__ issues between 2.1.x and 2.2.x on sparc(?)
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

References:
- Re: __gmon_start__ issues between 2.1.x and 2.2.x on sparc(?)
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: __gmon_start__ issues between 2.1.x and 2.2.x on sparc(?)
  - From: Franz Sirl
- Re: __gmon_start__ issues between 2.1.x and 2.2.x on sparc(?)
  - From: Ben Collins
- Re: __gmon_start__ issues between 2.1.x and 2.2.x on sparc(?)
  - From: Franz Sirl
- Re: __gmon_start__ issues between 2.1.x and 2.2.x on sparc(?)
  - From: Ben Collins

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]