This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Minor FAQ nit
- To: libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
- Subject: Minor FAQ nit
- From: Matthew Clarke <Matthew_Clarke at mindlink dot bc dot ca>
- Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 21:20:34 -0800
- Organization: Just Me
Hi.
Getting ready to update from 2-1-branch to 2.2 (head), I was refreshing my
wetware copy of the FAQ, and noticed this in section 2.16:
See also question question 2.31.
Turns out that FAQ.in provides the word "question" before the
cross-reference token, but scripts/gen-FAQ.pl also provides the word
"question" in the expansion of the cross-reference token. This occurs
twice.
A trivial patch, which assumes the script correct and FAQ.in incorrect:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Index: FAQ.in
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/glibc/libc/FAQ.in,v
retrieving revision 1.121
diff -u -r1.121 FAQ.in
--- FAQ.in 2001/02/10 13:14:58 1.121
+++ FAQ.in 2001/02/26 05:22:27
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@
??powerpc Which compiler should I use for powerpc?
{GK} You want to use at least gcc 2.95 (together with the right versions
-of all the other tools, of course). See also question ?excpt.
+of all the other tools, of course). See also ?excpt.
??arm Which tools should I use for ARM?
@@ -723,7 +723,7 @@
`db-Makefile' in the subdirectory `nss' and you can call it with `make -f
db-Makefile'. Please note that not all services are capable of using a
database. Currently passwd, group, ethers, protocol, rpc, services shadow
-and netgroup are implemented. See also question ?nssdb.
+and netgroup are implemented. See also ?nssdb.
?? I have /usr/include/net and /usr/include/scsi as symlinks
into my Linux source tree. Is that wrong?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Matt.
--
"Oh bother," said the Borg, "We have assimilated Pooh".
-- MHR on afp
-- According to a .sig by Chris Suslowicz