This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: PR review for 2.2.4: #1974
- To: Torsten dot Duwe at caldera dot de
- Subject: Re: PR review for 2.2.4: #1974
- From: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
- Date: 06 Jun 2001 12:49:47 +0200
- Cc: libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
- References: <200102151556.QAA21140@ns.caldera.de><20010215094356.A3353@valinux.com><14989.24250.474023.584488@ns.caldera.de><20010216091332.A20320@valinux.com><15124.54408.572938.625919@ns.caldera.de><m3snhnjdf7.fsf@D139.suse.de><15124.56194.583339.568099@ns.caldera.de><m3y9rfhxd2.fsf@D139.suse.de><15132.43389.624130.144004@ns.caldera.de> <u8r8wz5ami.fsf@gromit.moeb><15133.60192.604637.814556@ns.caldera.de>
Torsten Duwe <duwe@caldera.de> writes:
> Andreas> To get 2.2.4 out of the door we need some help with GNATS first.
> Andreas> Anybody looking through the reports and telling me what to do
> Andreas> with them is welcome!
>
> [http://bugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl requires _netscape_ & cookies --
> sheesh !]
>
> OK, here's my first one: #1974 "Installed glibc-2.2 and can no longer use g++"
>
> Indeed this is due to a change in glibc. However, since those changes usually
> are made for good, we at Caldera decided to sync up our gcc. Can some of you
> Cygnus folks eval and short circuit this to a gcc maintainer and close the
> PR? Is it in a CVS branch of gcc already ?
The appended patch is at least since the beginning of December in CVS
and therefore part of GCC 2.95.3. OK, I'll close the PR now with: Get
2.95.3 + atexit patches,
Thanks,
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger
SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
private aj@arthur.inka.de
http://www.suse.de/~aj