Re: glibc 2.2.4pre2

[Frédéric L. W. Meunier <0 at pervalidus dot net>]

On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 09:45:09AM +0200, Thorsten Kukuk wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 08, Frédéric L. W. Meunier wrote:
> 
> > Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> > 
> > >> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/bug-glibc/2001-07/msg00017.html
> > >> The second patch still isn't in gcc-2_95-branch 
> >                 
> > > You have to persuade Bernd Schmidt to apply the patch, GCC is
> > > beyond control of the glibc developers.
> > 
> > Bernd, Jakub: Could you both work together and release the
> > patch ? If 2.2.4 won't support GCC 3.0.1, then Red Hat's 2.96
> > will be the only supported compiler, what's a bad idea.
> 
> Why is Red Hat's 2.96 the only supported compiler ? gcc 2.95.3 from
> SuSE Linux 7.2 also works fine without problems.

OK, but not without both patches, right ? Vanilla 2.95.3 or
CVS 2.95.4 aren't.

> I think the same is true for Debian.

The same isn't true for Slackware 8.0. I think he'd like to
have the second patch so he can fix it for the next -current .

Anyway, I couldn't find the patch. I'm pretty sure it was
posted to some mailing-list, but searched the archives with
no luck.

-- 
0@pervalidus.{net, {dyndns.}org} Tel: 55-21-2717-2399 (Niterói-RJ BR)