This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: malloc
On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 12:16:36AM -0500, blackdragon@tyler.net wrote:
> now it appears that glibc is even slower than most, and alot more prone to
> error unless extreme care is taken.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
What did you mean by that? Did you mean other malloc implementations
could take more craps while the malloc in glibc would fail under the
same condition? If it is what you meant, I consider it is a very
good glibc feature.
H.J.