This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Should we optimize memset to bzero?

To: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Subject: Re: Should we optimize memset to bzero?
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 18:34:29 +0100
Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com>
References: <20011102082849.A7990@lucon.org> <20011102173800.D739@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> <20011102084406.B8318@lucon.org> <20011102175103.E739@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> <20011102085139.A8486@lucon.org> <20011102175905.F739@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> <20011102090629.A8646@lucon.org> <20011102181608.G739@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> <20011102092130.B8871@lucon.org>
Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>

On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 09:21:30AM -0800, H . J . Lu wrote:
> It is debatable if it will generate smaller code for Linux.

It does.

	Jakub

References:
- Should we optimize memset to bzero?
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: Should we optimize memset to bzero?
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: Should we optimize memset to bzero?
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: Should we optimize memset to bzero?
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: Should we optimize memset to bzero?
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: Should we optimize memset to bzero?
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: Should we optimize memset to bzero?
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: Should we optimize memset to bzero?
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: Should we optimize memset to bzero?
  - From: H . J . Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]