This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH: Re: Do we really want to use i586 code for i686?

To: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: Re: Do we really want to use i586 code for i686?
From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
Date: 12 Nov 2001 15:17:31 -0800
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland at frob dot com>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>
References: <20011112135241.A14247@lucon.org><20011112215840.6BA6499802@perdition.linnaean.org><20011112141325.B14500@lucon.org>
Reply-to: drepper at redhat dot com (Ulrich Drepper)

"H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> writes:

> That may work. How about we have
> 
> local:i586

Why this complexity?  The Implies file exists only for the Versions
file in linuxthreads/sysdeps/i386/i586.  New functionality hasn't been
proven to be necessary so adding it for this is no argument.  Simply
duplicate these few lines in an appropriate file and remove Implies.

-- 
---------------.                          ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat          `--' drepper at redhat.com   `------------------------

References:
- Re: PATCH: Re: Do we really want to use i586 code for i686?
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: PATCH: Re: Do we really want to use i586 code for i686?
  - From: Roland McGrath
- Re: PATCH: Re: Do we really want to use i586 code for i686?
  - From: H . J . Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]