This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Is sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/e_remainder.c broken?

From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
To: GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2001 01:14:22 -0800
Subject: Is sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/e_remainder.c broken?

Should we check all the functions in sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64 on x86? We
can hide those asm files in sysdeps/i386/fpu and sysdeps/i386/i686/fpu.

H.J.
---
Delivered-To: hjl@lucon.org
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 15:54:31 +0100
From: Carsten Langgaard <carstenl@mips.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.7 sun4u)
X-Accept-Language: en
To: "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
Cc: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: FPU test on RedHat7.1
Precedence: bulk

The file sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/e_remainder.c seems to have changed since
glibc-2.2.2.
I have attached the glibc-2.2.2 remainder file, which seems to work
better.

/Carsten

Attachment: fpu_test.c
Description: Text document

Follow-Ups:
- How do we test the IBM ieee754 math library?
  - From: H . J . Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]