This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Sun, 2002-04-07 at 09:03, Jeroen Dekkers wrote: > Sorry, maybe I wasn't clear. libc and ld have both there own version > of _dl_init_first but in the Versions it's only in libc. This causes > that the wrong _dl_init_first is called. It used to be there, but > somehow got removed in revision 1.33 (and the changelog entry doesn't > say so). I've added some changes now but I really don't think that the concept of _dl_init_first is good. The dependency ordering makes sure that the libc constructor is run before an of the dependencies. This almost always means it it run first. There are only two exceptions: - if a DSO really doesn't use the libc. Which is fine - if libpthread is used in which case a very minimal initialization is executed (this isn't even an issue for Hurd right now) It should be possible to eliminate the function. -- ---------------. ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `------------------------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |