This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] PPC libgcc compatibility

From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
To: Franz Sirl <Franz dot Sirl-kernel at lauterbach dot com>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: 20 May 2002 09:18:24 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PPC libgcc compatibility
References: <5.1.1.2.2.20020515143613.03b4f830@mail.lauterbach.com><20020515085820.U13411@devserv.devel.redhat.com><200205152104.50325@enzo.bigblue.local> <200205201747.20382@enzo.bigblue.local>

On Mon, 2002-05-20 at 08:47, Franz Sirl wrote:

> Ok, if I keep divdi3 all is well, I don't understand why, but no more 
> complaints about doubled definitions between glibc and libgcc_s linking 
> shared c++ libs.
> 
> Uli, unless 2.3 is very close, it would be nice if this could go on the branch 
> too.

What is with the files added before?  Is this in addition?  It seems to
duplicate some symbols.

-- 
---------------.                          ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat          `--' drepper at redhat.com   `------------------------

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] PPC libgcc compatibility
  - From: Franz Sirl

References:
- Re: [PATCH] PPC libgcc compatibility
  - From: Franz Sirl
- Re: [PATCH] PPC libgcc compatibility
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [PATCH] PPC libgcc compatibility
  - From: Franz Sirl
- Re: [PATCH] PPC libgcc compatibility
  - From: Franz Sirl

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]