This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH: Treat RTLD_LOCAL like Solaris (Re: Duplicate data objects in shared libraries)

From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
To: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
Cc: David Abrahams <david dot abrahams at rcn dot com>,"Martin v. Loewis" <martin at v dot loewis dot de>, drepper at redhat dot com,"Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve" <rwgk at cci dot lbl dot gov>,GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 09:48:24 -0700
Subject: Re: PATCH: Treat RTLD_LOCAL like Solaris (Re: Duplicate data objects in shared libraries)
References: <76260000.1021912729@warlock.codesourcery.com> <wvlhel2ocz3.fsf@prospero.cambridge.redhat.com> <60630000.1021922077@gandalf.codesourcery.com> <00ba01c20035$805388a0$6601a8c0@boostconsulting.com> <wvln0uumvqt.fsf@prospero.cambridge.redhat.com> <08b101c201f0$d511fd60$6601a8c0@boostconsulting.com> <wvloff7ea9a.fsf@prospero.cambridge.redhat.com> <20020529130945.A16909@lucon.org>

On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 01:09:45PM -0700, H . J . Lu wrote:
> This patch makes glibc more like Solaris for RTLD_LOCAL. It also passed
> "make check" in glibc. Any comments?
> 
> BTW, we need to fully document the RTLD_LOCAL behavior.
> 
> 

Here is an update. I need to adjust one assert in dl-close.c.


H.J.

Attachment: glibc-local.patch
Description: Text document

References:
- PATCH: Treat RTLD_LOCAL like Solaris (Re: Duplicate data objects in shared libraries)
  - From: H . J . Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]