This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Many new math failures


Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> writes:

> On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 08:27:49AM -0700, H . J . Lu wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 02:15:15PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>> > Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> writes:
>> > 
>> > > "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> writes:
>> > >
>> > >> I got many new math failures on a dual P3/1GHz running RedHat 7.3:
>> > >
>> > > I'll look into these today on my P3, the ULP files I committed where
>> > > tested on an Athlon.
>> > 
>> > HJ, on my P3 I only had failures for long double and committed the
>> > needed change, the rest works fine for me.  Please run the test
>> 
>> It may be compiler dependent. I am using gcc 2.96 from RedHat 7.3.
>
> Yes, especially some of the complex routines are quite compiler dependant,
> e.g. I always had a few ULP failures with gcc 3.1 while it worked just fine
> in 2.96-RH. It might be the other way this time.

I used GCC 3.1 for this.  I don't have a problem adding compiler
dependent ULPs, just send me the ULPs file and I'll integrate it.

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger
  SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
   private aj@arthur.inka.de
    http://www.suse.de/~aj


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]