This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: mips64 n32 and n64 suport in elf/


Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com> writes:

> On Mar 14, 2003, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com> wrote:
>
>> 	* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips/mips64/n32/dl-librecon.h: New file.
>> 	* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips/mips64/n64/dl-librecon.h: New file.
>> 	* elf/rtld.c (process_envvars): Handle
>> 	EXTRA_LD_PROCESS_ENVVARS_DECLS, EXTRA_LD_LEN14_ENVVARS and
>> 	EXTRA_LD_AFTER_PROCESS_ENVVARS.
>
> Andreas, are the mips-specific changes ok?  I'm thinking I could

One without the other does not make sense IMO.  Please come up with a
complete patchset. 

> arrange to have rtld.c patched by mips-specific configury magic, if
> Uli stands against these minor, clean changes in rtld.c.  Of course,
> he'd be trading minor cleanliness in rtld.c for major gunk in
> mips-specific code, but if he keeps opposing the port on the basis of
> prejudice, I think we may have to bite the bullet and do it the ugly
> way.  Which also means that whenever the patch stops applying
> correctly, we'll have to update it.  This sucks, but it's not like
> we're not used to updating patch files such that they apply in RPM
> sources anyway :-)

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger
  SuSE Labs aj at suse dot de
   private aj at arthur dot inka dot de
    http://www.suse.de/~aj


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]