This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: libm.so vs libgcj.so
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Jack Howarth wrote:
> Well I was wondering more so why these symbols were weak in libm.so?
> It would seem that library should have precedence for such math related
> symbols, no?
Weak or not does not matter in the least.
- --
- --------------. ,-. 444 Castro Street
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-----------------' \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA
Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `---------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+x+hd2ijCOnn/RHQRAjzQAJ9x1SJg9ascqBo2D6TltiW8x0BJbwCcDVzo
UTU4xSyOvlZfZ1+5PdqC1ic=
=htKx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----