This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Does gcc 3.4 compile glibc in CVS?
- From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
- To: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
- Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 13:32:26 -0700
- Subject: Re: Does gcc 3.4 compile glibc in CVS?
- References: <20030611154459.GA27293@lucon.org> <u84r2wh5tg.fsf@gromit.moeb>
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 07:39:23PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> writes:
>
> > When I tried gcc 3.4 from CVS to build glibc in CVS, I got
> >
> > make[4]: ***
> > [/export/build/gnu/glibc-3.4/build-pentium4-linux/math/test-float.out] Error 1
> > make[4]: ***
> > [/export/build/gnu/glibc-3.4/build-pentium4-linux/math/test-double.out] Error 1
> > make[4]: ***
> > [/export/build/gnu/glibc-3.4/build-pentium4-linux/math/test-ldouble.out] Error
> > 1
> > make[3]: *** [math/xtests] Error 2
> > make[4]: ***
> > [/export/build/gnu/glibc-3.4/build-pentium4-linux/string/inl-tester.out] Error
> > 1
> > make[3]: *** [string/xtests] Error 2
> > make[2]: *** [xcheck] Error 2
> > make[1]: *** [check] Error 2
> > make: *** [one] Error 2
> >
> > gcc gcc-3_2-rhl8-branch is ok. Is that a known problem?
>
> The inl-tester is a known problem, I filed a bug report for it,
>
Are those math failures also known problems? Since gcc 3.4 is quite
close now, shouldn't they be considered very serious regressions?
H.J.