This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: proposal: making sure all locales use the same section order
- From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
- To: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere at hungry dot com>
- Cc: libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 13:56:32 -0700
- Subject: Re: proposal: making sure all locales use the same section order
- Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
- References: <E19SNNt-0005fW-00@minerva.hungry.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Any order would do, but I suggest wo stick with the order of the
> sections in the only standard document I have available, ie ISO/IEC TR
> 14652:202(E):
Why do you keep referring to this unusable write-up which has no
approval by anybody and which does not reflect what we have in glibc?
> Is this a good or a bad idea?
It means extra work and therefore I wouldn't do it. If somebody else
does, fine. But then make absolutely sure the file content stays the
same. Use md5sum or so on the created files before and after the changes.
- --
- --------------. ,-. 444 Castro Street
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-----------------' \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA
Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `---------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+74CA2ijCOnn/RHQRAk05AJ9RCq8hqr7kO2MrvmWOb4nKZ9G0QQCaA5Fx
bCBlpi1hME/dsb5adKv8mis=
=PlbZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----