This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: binutils version
Just tried 0.55, same story. I'm obviously doing something here no one
else is doing.
Hmf.
On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 19:00, Shawn wrote:
> Yep.
>
> On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 18:43, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 06:18:07PM -0500, Shawn wrote:
> > > It seems the test for $libc_cv_asm_cfi_directives in
> > > nptl/sysdeps/pthread/configure[.in] is looking at a variablke found
> > > nowhere else in the libc tree.
> > >
> > > I figure I'm not groking some automake junk here.
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 18:04, Shawn wrote:
> > > > # as --version
> > > > GNU assembler 2.14.90.0.5 20030722
> > > >
> > > > I just tried, and got:
> > > > checking for i386 TLS support... yes
> > > > running configure fragment for ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux
> > > > running configure fragment for ../nptl/sysdeps/pthread
> > > > configure: error: CFI directive support in assembler is required
> > > >
> >
> > Did you use nptl 0.54?
> >
> >
> > H.J.