This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Nick Marcantonio <nmarcantonio@VCI.com> writes: > After some searching, I discovered that this problem was a result of using > gcc 3.3. I went ahead and built gcc 3.2.3, recompiled, discovered another > issue that required binutils to be updated, so I compiled binutils 2.14, and > rebuilt glibc 2.3.2. Glibc built correctly, but a 'make install' failed > because of the following: > > ld-linux.so.2: version GLIBC_2.2 not found > ld-linux.so.2: version GLIBC_2.1.1 not found > ld-linux.so.2: version GLIBC_2.2.3 not found > > Now all executables (ls, make, which, etc) fail for the same reason. Is > there any possible way to recover from this? Thanks in advance. How did you configure glibc? I would advise to use prebuild packages from your distribution, there's more than one way to break your system with glibc, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, 90429 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
Attachment:
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |