This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi All, The following is an attach file fix for duplicate definitions for lo_LA locale. Re-tested with 'localedef -f UFT-8 -I lo_LA lo_LA.UTF-8', it works fine. Thanks. Anousak Souphavanh -----Original Message----- From: libc-alpha-owner@sources.redhat.com [mailto:libc-alpha-owner@sources.redhat.com] On Behalf Of Thorsten Kukuk Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 12:06 AM To: libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com Subject: U0EAF duplicate in lo_LA Hi, locales/lo_LA has a duplicate entry for U0EAF: locales/lo_LA:610: order for `U00000EAF' already defined at locales/lo_LA:285 Does somebody knows, what the correct one is? Thanks, Thorsten -- Thorsten Kukuk http://www.suse.de/~kukuk/ kukuk@suse.de SuSE Linux AG Deutschherrnstr. 15-19 D-90429 Nuernberg -------------------------------------------------------------------- Key fingerprint = A368 676B 5E1B 3E46 CFCE 2D97 F8FD 4E23 56C6 FB4B
Attachment:
lo_LA.txt
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |