This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: misc vfprintf cleanups admissible?

From: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com>
To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
Cc: libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 15:30:49 -0500
Subject: Re: misc vfprintf cleanups admissible?

Would a patch converting the following macros to inline functions be
acceptable?

Not if the object code is changed.

Is this a speed issue? Have macros been known to be faster for this particular case? Or is this some weird ABI issue I am unaware of?

If it is a speed issue, are we talking _exactly_ the same object code, or will we worry about a few extra instructions ;-).

Cheers.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: misc vfprintf cleanups admissible?
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: misc vfprintf cleanups admissible?
  - From: Ulrich Drepper

References:
- Re: misc vfprintf cleanups admissible?
  - From: Ulrich Drepper

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]