This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4snapshot 20031119
- From: Robert Moss <robert dot moss at jesus dot ox dot ac dot uk>
- To: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
- Cc: Dan Kegel <dank at kegel dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 07:32:39 +0000
- Subject: Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4snapshot 20031119
- References: <3FC21EDC.5010702@jesus.ox.ac.uk> <3FC2398F.3040401@kegel.com> <3FC2A5D0.6070906@jesus.ox.ac.uk> <3FC2F838.4000306@kegel.com> <3FC32EEC.1000802@jesus.ox.ac.uk> <3FC337FF.9040402@jesus.ox.ac.uk> <3FC3458E.4030504@jesus.ox.ac.uk> <3FC38F41.7090908@kegel.com> <3FC4E42A.2040001@jesus.ox.ac.uk> <u84qwjydys.fsf@gromit.moeb>
Andreas, can you confirm that this is in fact the problem, and that it's
nothing to do with the (possibly slightly ridiculous) situation in glibc
in which the source uses asm behind gcc's back in relation to weak
functions?
Rob
Andreas Jaeger wrote:
It seems that visibilty handling is completly broken, see
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13134. Without this bug
fixed, GCC cannot compile glibc correctly.
Andreas
Attachment:
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature