Re: Does the current glibc build?

[Segher Boessenkool <segher at kernel dot crashing dot org>]

On 15-jan-04, at 20:09, Ulrich Drepper wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> H. J. Lu wrote:
> > __libc_stack_end is now hidden in rtld.c. But it is still referenced 
> > by
> > backtrace.c. As the result, I got undefined symbol during glibc build.
> > Did I miss somehing?
>
> $ readelf -s elf/ld.so|fgrep __libc_stack_end
>    33: 00014f3c      4 OBJECT  GLOBAL DEFAULT       13
> __libc_stack_end@@GLIBC_2.1
>   472: 00014f3c      4 OBJECT  LOCAL  HIDDEN        13 
> __GI___libc_stack_end
>   581: 00014f3c      4 OBJECT  GLOBAL DEFAULT       13 __libc_stack_end
>
>
> Something on your system is broken if __libc_stack_end is hidden in 
> your
> builds.

powerpc64-ibm-linux-gnu:

$ readelf -s elf/ld.so | fgrep __libc_stack_end
   700: 0000000000033550     8 OBJECT  LOCAL  HIDDEN   20 
__GI___libc_stack_end

Not only his system...


Segher