libc-alpha archive
date index for June, 2007

This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

June 30, 2007
20:54 Re: RFC: ldconfig speedup Florian Weimer
17:08 Re: glibc CVS does not build on i586... Ulrich Drepper
15:32 glibc CVS does not build on i586... Andreas Jaeger

June 28, 2007
15:43 Re: alpha/sigsuspend.S failure due to cfi mismatches Mike Frysinger
15:24 Re: alpha/sigsuspend.S failure due to cfi mismatches Balint Cristian
14:37 Re: alpha/sigsuspend.S failure due to cfi mismatches Mike Frysinger
14:12 Re: building glibc 2.6 Allin Cottrell
12:30 Re: alpha/sigsuspend.S failure due to cfi mismatches Mike Frysinger

June 27, 2007
19:21 Re: RFC: ldconfig speedup Andreas Jaeger
19:02 Re: RFC: ldconfig speedup Roland McGrath
15:54 Re: RFC: ldconfig speedup Ulrich Drepper
15:49 Re: NPTL libthread_db changes for static debugging Daniel Jacobowitz
15:40 Re: RFC: ldconfig speedup Andreas Jaeger

June 26, 2007
21:35 libc manual compliments Karl Berry
18:58 Re: RFC: ldconfig speedup Roland McGrath
18:58 Re: Contribution on writting manuals Roland McGrath
18:20 Very fast log implementation with adjustable accuracy Gerald Friedland
17:31 Re: NPTL libthread_db changes for static debugging Roland McGrath
14:50 Re: RFC: ldconfig speedup Michael Schroeder
14:26 Re: RFC: ldconfig speedup Jakub Jelinek
11:26 Re: NPTL libthread_db changes for static debugging Daniel Jacobowitz
09:21 Contribution on writting manuals Hugo de Cuffa
08:12 RFC: ldconfig speedup Andreas Jaeger
06:46 Re: NPTL libthread_db changes for static debugging Roland McGrath

June 25, 2007
15:26 Re: NPTL libthread_db changes for static debugging Daniel Jacobowitz
15:20 Re: [PATCH] get_random_long() and AT_ENTROPY for auxv, kernel 2.6.21.5 Matt Mackall
15:02 Re: [PATCH] get_random_long() and AT_ENTROPY for auxv, kernel 2.6.21.5 Alexander Gabert
08:59 Re: NPTL libthread_db changes for static debugging Roland McGrath
07:09 Re: [PATCH] get_random_long() and AT_ENTROPY for auxv, kernel 2.6.21.5 Jakub Jelinek
05:12 Re: [PATCH] get_random_long() and AT_ENTROPY for auxv, kernel 2.6.21.5 Matt Mackall
04:43 Re: [PATCH] get_random_long() and AT_ENTROPY for auxv, kernel 2.6.21.5 Arjan van de Ven
03:45 Re: [PATCH] get_random_long() and AT_ENTROPY for auxv, kernel 2.6.21.5 Matt Mackall

June 24, 2007
17:45 Re: [PATCH] get_random_long() and AT_ENTROPY for auxv, kernel 2.6.21.5 Alexander Gabert

June 22, 2007
21:53 Re: libc -> gcc link Karl Berry

June 21, 2007
22:40 Re: libc -> gcc link Roland McGrath
21:41 libc -> gcc link Karl Berry

June 20, 2007
20:31 Re: [PATCH] get_random_long() and AT_ENTROPY for auxv, kernel 2.6.21.5 Matt Mackall
17:04 Re: [PATCH] get_random_long() and AT_ENTROPY for auxv, kernel 2.6.21.5 Eric Dumazet
16:40 Re: [PATCH] get_random_long() and AT_ENTROPY for auxv, kernel 2.6.21.5 Linus Torvalds
15:41 Re: [PATCH] get_random_long() and AT_ENTROPY for auxv, kernel 2.6.21.5 Arjan van de Ven
15:34 [PATCH] get_random_long() and AT_ENTROPY for auxv, kernel 2.6.21.5 Alexander Gabert
05:27 Re: [PATCH] fix __fxstatat64 function Carmelo Amoroso

June 19, 2007
23:55 weak/strong definitions Ilya Lipovsky
14:02 Re: pthread_attr_init: default value of inhertished flag Jakub Jelinek
12:20 pthread_attr_init: default value of inhertished flag Carmelo Amoroso

June 18, 2007
21:00 The Linux binutils 2.17.50.0.17 is released H. J. Lu
15:13 Re: building glibc 2.6 Mike Frysinger
12:06 building glibc 2.6 Allin Cottrell
10:36 Re: AT_ENTROPY1 and AT_ENTROPY2 values for include/linux/auxvec.h Alexander Gabert
01:40 Re: AT_ENTROPY1 and AT_ENTROPY2 values for include/linux/auxvec.h Arjan van de Ven
01:28 Re: AT_ENTROPY1 and AT_ENTROPY2 values for include/linux/auxvec.h Alexander Gabert
01:09 Re: AT_ENTROPY1 and AT_ENTROPY2 values for include/linux/auxvec.h Arjan van de Ven

June 17, 2007
23:40 AT_ENTROPY1 and AT_ENTROPY2 values for include/linux/auxvec.h Alexander Gabert
18:19 Re: Extra defines for sys/ptrace.h Jeff Bailey
17:27 Re: Extra defines for sys/ptrace.h Andreas Jaeger
16:44 Re: Extra defines for sys/ptrace.h Ulrich Drepper

June 16, 2007
22:13 glibc and the vsyscall page Sharath George
17:47 Re: Extra defines for sys/ptrace.h Jeff Bailey
17:29 Extra defines for sys/ptrace.h Andreas Jaeger

June 15, 2007
15:32 Re: pthread_cleanup_push Daniel Jacobowitz
15:24 Re: pthread_cleanup_push Maksym Yehorov
15:24 Re: "Segfault/illegal instruction" - udevd - ntpd - glibc Ulrich Drepper
15:18 Re: pthread_cleanup_push Daniel Jacobowitz
15:16 pthread_cleanup_push Maksym Yehorov
04:42 "Segfault/illegal instruction" - udevd - ntpd - glibc Sadarul Firos

June 14, 2007
19:02 [PATCH, take-2, soft-fp]: Allow gcc to override soft-fp compare return type Uros Bizjak
18:15 Fwd: Oddity in profiliing + pthreads Aaron Wiebe
02:52 how to invoke thread-safe glibc functions? Jiayuan Meng

June 13, 2007
21:05 Re: Backtrace() called inside a signal handler traps while tracking an invalid function call. Daniel Jacobowitz
20:56 Backtrace() called inside a signal handler traps while tracking an invalid function call. supriya kannery
14:19 [PATCH] fix __fxstatat64 function Carmelo Amoroso

June 12, 2007
08:40 Re: modified glibc compilation segfault on making sunrpc Jakub Jelinek
08:04 modified glibc compilation segfault on making sunrpc Sharath George

June 11, 2007
20:02 Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!? Nix
19:58 Re: How to implement alloca()? Nix
16:26 Re: [PATCH, soft-fp]: Use mode(word) as a return type from soft-fp comparisons Uros Bizjak
16:03 Re: [PATCH, soft-fp]: Use mode(word) as a return type from soft-fp comparisons Daniel Jacobowitz
10:13 Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!? Maciej W. Rozycki
09:59 Re: libc behind the curtain Mike Frysinger
09:56 Re: libc behind the curtain Metuki Sabhe
09:45 Re: libc behind the curtain Mike Frysinger
08:40 libc behind the curtain Metuki Sabhe
07:50 How to implement alloca()? Neo Jia

June 09, 2007
09:05 [PATCH, soft-fp]: Use mode(word) as a return type from soft-fp comparisons Uros Bizjak

June 08, 2007
21:33 Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!? James Youngman
21:03 Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!? Conn Clark
20:31 Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!? Jeremy Linton
20:27 Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!? Nix
19:59 Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!? Ulrich Drepper
19:40 Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!? Jeremy Linton
19:36 Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!? Jeremy Linton
19:34 Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!? Nix
17:36 Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!? Petr Baudis
11:17 Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!? Jan-Benedict Glaw
10:54 Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!? James Youngman
10:22 Re: arch-independent glibc printf segfault for "special" long double values Bruno Haible
09:28 Re: arch-independent glibc printf segfault for "special" long double values Jan-Benedict Glaw
09:09 Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!? Jan-Benedict Glaw
08:53 Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!? James Youngman
08:48 arch-independent glibc printf segfault for "special" long double values Jim Meyering
08:46 Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!? Jan-Benedict Glaw
08:22 Application Mr . Collins Okolie
04:47 Re: [patch] prevent BASH env pollution from corrupting AC_PATH_PROG(bash) search Mike Frysinger
03:18 Re: [patch] prevent BASH env pollution from corrupting AC_PATH_PROG(bash) search Ulrich Drepper

June 07, 2007
23:23 Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!? Jan-Benedict Glaw
23:14 Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!? Nix
23:03 Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!? Jan-Benedict Glaw
22:53 Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!? Jan-Benedict Glaw
18:29 Re: LD_PROFILE with glibc-2.4 on mips-linux Ulrich Drepper
18:25 Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!? Ben Pfaff
18:23 strcasestr improvement proposal Olivier Langlois
17:57 Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!? Tor Myklebust
17:55 Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!? Mike Frysinger
17:35 Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!? Jan-Benedict Glaw
17:27 Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!? Mike Frysinger
17:26 LD_PROFILE with glibc-2.4 on mips-linux John Van Horne
17:20 Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!? Jan-Benedict Glaw
16:06 Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!? Mike Frysinger
15:05 Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!? Jeremy Linton
10:17 Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!? Jakub Jelinek
10:10 Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!? Jan-Benedict Glaw
02:26 Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!? Ulrich Drepper
02:09 Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!? Bruno Haible
01:50 Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!? Bruno Haible
01:46 Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!? Bruno Haible

June 06, 2007
23:28 Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!? Ulrich Drepper
23:20 Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!? Andreas Schwab
22:51 Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!? Paul Mackerras
21:44 Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!? James Youngman
19:43 non rentrant functions causing thread safe function crashes. Jeremy Linton
17:21 Re: [RFC] handling unexpected return values from kernel Ulrich Drepper
17:08 [RFC] handling unexpected return values from kernel Sripathi Kodi
16:05 Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!? Jim Meyering
14:22 Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!? Andreas Schwab
14:13 Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!? Jim Meyering
14:08 Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!? John Haxby
13:40 Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!? Andreas Schwab
13:36 Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!? Jim Meyering
12:48 Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!? Andreas Schwab
12:32 glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!? Jim Meyering

June 01, 2007
19:31 [patch] prevent BASH env pollution from corrupting AC_PATH_PROG(bash) search Mike Frysinger


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3