This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: 2.10 done

From: Roland McGrath <roland at redhat dot com>
To: ams at gnu dot org
Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 19:50:50 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: 2.10 done
References: <4A0636DD.7040003@redhat.com><E1M38QO-0001EC-8r@fencepost.gnu.org><4A072431.5070300@redhat.com><E1M3MIm-0005r0-2b@fencepost.gnu.org>

> I've moved them away for now, and will upload 2.10.1 when it is done.
> Would people be OK if the 2.10 tarballs where left as they are, or
> should that be replaced with a README as to not confuse users?

I think it's fine to have no 2.10 at all there and just have 2.9 followed
by 2.10.1.


Thanks,
Roland

References:
- 2.10 done
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: 2.10 done
  - From: Alfred M. Szmidt
- Re: 2.10 done
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: 2.10 done
  - From: Alfred M. Szmidt

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]