This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Maintaining 2.12

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>
To: Matt Turner <mattst88 at gmail dot com>
Cc: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org,Petr Baudis <pasky at suse dot cz>,roland at redhat dot com,schwab at redhat dot com,ams at gnu dot org,carlos at systemhalted dot org,joseph at codesourcery dot com
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 12:38:35 -0400
Subject: Re: Maintaining 2.12
References: <20100513142934.GK16800@machine.or.cz> <201007261852.18256.vapier@gentoo.org> <AANLkTimWcxfbcgtrz3DjkuM95TMPfCM+wesRE6ZLNj+c@mail.gmail.com>

On Thursday, August 05, 2010 10:58:25 Matt Turner wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > On Monday, June 21, 2010 15:00:26 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> so it looks like glibc-2.12 has been branched in git about a week ago.
> >>  and it's been about 1.5 months since glibc-2.12 was tagged, and
> >> fortunately glibc- ports was tagged shortly there after.
> >> 
> >> will the tarballs be packaged soon now ?
> > 
> > another month gone by ... are we going back to the system where distros
> > have to roll their own tarballs ?
> 
> There are glibc-2.12.1 tarballs on ftp.gnu.org/gnu/glibc/ as of Aug 3.
> Never saw any announcement though.

thanks, i hadnt noticed.  ive updated the main arches to glibc-2.12.1 in 
Gentoo, but now i just have to wait for someone to make a ports tarball ...
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Maintaining 2.12
  - From: Carlos O'Donell

References:
- Re: Maintaining 2.12
  - From: Matt Turner

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]