This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Avoid relocation in fptr code used by rtld.

From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at gmail dot com>
To: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: libc-alpha <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 11:10:25 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Avoid relocation in fptr code used by rtld.
References: <4DE53C5B.80901@codesourcery.com> <CAOPLpQeNc1h3U2MtXOAH=8fnVu0FSmJ3BEFW06DshsNHbk6_oQ@mail.gmail.com><4E15C232.2020701@codesourcery.com> <CAOPLpQdJXBkBSgAXqHaw302CyMJX+ytkdAcp87Y+EP-yUqrZVA@mail.gmail.com><4E15C5C3.1030002@codesourcery.com>

On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 10:42, Carlos O'Donell <carlos@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> My understanding is that we should not require any special order of
> relocation processing. Was I wrong in that understanding?

No.  Relative relocation must always be resolved first. the linker has
to order the relocation tables like that.  This has always been the
case.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Avoid relocation in fptr code used by rtld.
  - From: Carlos O'Donell

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Avoid relocation in fptr code used by rtld.
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: [PATCH] Avoid relocation in fptr code used by rtld.
  - From: Carlos O'Donell
- Re: [PATCH] Avoid relocation in fptr code used by rtld.
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: [PATCH] Avoid relocation in fptr code used by rtld.
  - From: Carlos O'Donell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]