This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: BZ#12509 changes
- From: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot com>
- To: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org, Michael Matz <matz at suse dot de>
- Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at gmail dot com>,Andreas Schwab <schwab at redhat dot com>,Roland McGrath <roland at hack dot frob dot com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 16:58:09 +0200
- Subject: Re: BZ#12509 changes
- References: <20110829163133.7AA872C0E9@topped-with-meat.com> <m3y5y8pv2o.fsf@hase.home> <CAOPLpQf338AkPz35pfKvV29xWqFUf32QC3gsgrkMMv3XRE_iRg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tuesday, September 06, 2011 05:44:04 Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 03:42, Andreas Schwab <schwab@redhat.com> wrote:
> > You can find my original patch in the libc-hacker archive.
>
> That patch is not correct. It might not cause a crash but it does
> cause an explicit dlopen/dlclose of an DSO which was previously opened
> as a dependencies of a dlopen call to have a different scope.
>
> I haven't seen any report with a reproducible description of a
> problem. I haven't even seen anything close to a description of the
> situation. Just some gdb backtrace and that's not sufficient.
Michael, didn't you have a testcase for this one? It was bnc#703140,
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126