This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Add missing sparc32 NPTL file otherwise we use the wronglowlevellock.c implementation.

From: Richard Henderson <rth at twiddle dot net>
To: David Miller <davem at davemloft dot net>
Cc: schwab at linux-m68k dot org, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 10:06:37 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add missing sparc32 NPTL file otherwise we use the wronglowlevellock.c implementation.
References: <20120315.211406.404873818467697172.davem@davemloft.net> <m27gykubb4.fsf@igel.home> <20120316.030308.2131997131517732347.davem@davemloft.net>

On 03/16/12 03:03, David Miller wrote:
> Ok, would something as simple as having it include <lowlevellock.c>
> instead of "lowlevellock.c" do the right thing?

Probably.  If that works for sparc it'll work for arm too.


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Add missing sparc32 NPTL file otherwise we use thewrong lowlevellock.c implementation.
  - From: David Miller

References:
- [PATCH] Add missing sparc32 NPTL file otherwise we use the wronglowlevellock.c implementation.
  - From: David Miller
- Re: [PATCH] Add missing sparc32 NPTL file otherwise we use the wrong lowlevellock.c implementation.
  - From: Andreas Schwab
- Re: [PATCH] Add missing sparc32 NPTL file otherwise we use thewrong lowlevellock.c implementation.
  - From: David Miller

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]