This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [BZ #13739] Remove standalone manual support
- From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at systemhalted dot org>
- To: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
- Cc: libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 17:28:19 -0400
- Subject: Re: [BZ #13739] Remove standalone manual support
- References: <87k4186hba.fsf@linux-6dv9.site>
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> wrote:
> As Joseph states in #13739, we don't need a separate manual distribution
> tar ball anymore. I've removed support for it.
>
> Testing with building glibc on Linux/x86-64 and running make info,
>
> Ok to commit?
>
> Andreas
>
> 2012-04-21 ?Andreas Jaeger ?<aj@suse.de>
>
> ? ? ? ?[BZ #13739]
> ? ? ? ?* manual/Makefile: Remove make dist support, there's no
> ? ? ? ?need for a stand-alone documentation tar ball.
> ? ? ? ?(TEXI2DVI): Define always, it's not in Makeconfig.
> ? ? ? ?(dist): Removed.
> ? ? ? ?(tar-it): Removed.
> ? ? ? ?(edition): Removed.
> ? ? ? ?(glibc-doc-$(edition).tar): Removed
> ? ? ? ?(%.Z): Removed.
> ? ? ? ?(%.gz): Removed.
> ? ? ? ?(%.uu): Removed.
> ? ? ? ?(ETAGS): Remove, it's in Makeconfig.
> ? ? ? ?(move-if-change): Remove, it's in Makeconfig.
I agree. Please check this in. We don't need a separate manual
distribution tarball. My goal is to have *one* tarball :-)
Cheers,
Carlos.