This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: PLT refs dependent upon gcc version...
- From: David Miller <davem at davemloft dot net>
- To: roland at hack dot frob dot com
- Cc: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:11:31 -0400 (EDT)
- Subject: Re: PLT refs dependent upon gcc version...
- References: <20120319.145317.1662913162397014741.davem@davemloft.net><20120424210358.4E2222C0B9@topped-with-meat.com>
From: Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:03:58 -0700 (PDT)
> I've committed the following. Each arch maintainer with a localplt-*.data
> file should change them to use ? on the lines for PLT calls such as the
> compiler-generated outcalls, which are acceptable but not mandatory. The
> data files can have # comment lines now, so you can say something pithy
> about why your machine has extra PLT entries that it really shouldn't
> have. (GCC could use a switch to treat generated libgcc calls like
> attribute_hidden calls so we could get rid of these PLT entries.)
Thanks a lot Roland, I'll take a look at this.