From: Andreas Jaeger<aj@suse.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 20:47:21 +0200
On 04/27/2012 01:19 AM, David Miller wrote:
[...]
--- /dev/null
+++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/data/libutil.abilist
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+GLIBC_2.2.5
+ GLIBC_2.2.5 A
+ forkpty F
+ login F
+ login_tty F
+ logout F
+ logwtmp F
+ openpty F
So far the abilist contained expressions like
"x86_64-.*-linux.*/thread", so including the usage of nptl. I think we
had no abilists without nptl but the tools supported it.
I see no more way to generate abilists without thread.
I think it's fine that nptl is required (if my understanding of the
"thread" keyword in abilists is correct), just wanted to point this
out so we can think whether it makes a difference.
I recognized this. But if nobody bothered to care for how many years,
I see now need to account for it at the current point in time.
We can certainly handle it later if necessary.