This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Tuesday 17 April 2012 23:27:26 Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Thursday 12 April 2012 13:30:38 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > The current tftp structure does not work when fortification is enabled. > > Starting with gcc-4.5, more size checking was added to trigger these. > > Older versions just didn't have enough information, so they returned -1 > > as the sizes. > > > > First, the tu_stuff field is declared as 1 byte (when it's really an > > arbitrary length C string), so attempting to strcpy() with it results > > in crashes. This fails with _FORTIFY_SOURCE=1. > > > > Second, even if we change that to [0] (since gcc does not allow flexible > > array members in an union), gcc is not smart enough to see that they are > > two overlapping flexible arrays (tu_stuff and tu_data), so it will still > > trigger an abort with _FORTIFY_SOURCE=2. This is because it thinks that > > tu_stuff is 0 bytes and tu_data comes after it. > > > > Talking to upstream gcc, they don't seem terribly inclined to fix the > > 2nd issue, but even if they did, we still have plenty of 4.5 and 4.6 > > installs that would hit problems. > > > > So, let's re-order with a few more anonymous structs & unions so that > > the fields are laid out with a zero-length array always as the last > > field. This seems to fix things with gcc-4.6, and the tftp-hpa pkg > > continues to build & work. > > any complaints on this version ? no love ? -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |