This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: regression caused by fix of bug #13691

From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at systemhalted dot org>
To: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot com>
Cc: "Ryan S. Arnold" <ryan dot arnold at gmail dot com>, Bruno Haible <bruno at clisp dot org>, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho <tuliom at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 15:02:22 -0400
Subject: Re: regression caused by fix of bug #13691
References: <1995140.sSugJaaxUI@linuix><2067132.852nzsjA0z@linuix><CAAKybw8Ce_Hyx_RC279cKed_r9TPJg-oFOhkD14SM7DhpjBQYA@mail.gmail.com><CADZpyiy3iK9wW-FKLReGQPGhfWs+p-w4-6VMGi4fO24Bem3c5A@mail.gmail.com><4FB7E745.2020002@suse.com>

On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.com> wrote:
> So, do we agree to revert the patch? I haven't heard anybody saying the
> opposite and since I committed the patch, I feel obliged to revert it - but
> will give others time to speak up and wait until Monday,

I think we should revert it.

Given Bruno's comments this locale should never have been listed as supported.

The question which is still up in the air is "Why does the code read
like it supportes stateful encodings?"

Cheers,
Carlos.

References:
- regression caused by fix of bug #13691
  - From: Bruno Haible
- Re: regression caused by fix of bug #13691
  - From: Bruno Haible
- Re: regression caused by fix of bug #13691
  - From: Ryan S. Arnold
- Re: regression caused by fix of bug #13691
  - From: Carlos O'Donell
- Re: regression caused by fix of bug #13691
  - From: Andreas Jaeger

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]